Ridge Preservation Procedures: Review of Current Literature

被引:0
|
作者
Lai P.-C. [1 ]
Greenwell H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Graduate Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, 501 South Preston Street, Louisville, 40202, KY
关键词
Biomaterials; Bone regeneration; Bone substitutes; Dental implants; Ridge preservation; Tooth extraction;
D O I
10.1007/s40496-020-00281-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures have become one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in dentistry, due to increased demand for dental implant therapy. Previous studies have repeatedly shown a naturally healed socket could lose up to 50% of its buccolingual width, which in turn would negatively impact the future implant placement. ARP procedures have been shown to consistently reduce the amount of post-extraction horizontal and vertical bone loss; however, it is still not conclusive which biomaterial or technique is the most superior. The purpose of this article is to review current evidence on various ARP procedures. Recent Findings: The electronic database search was limited to the past 3 years (publication dates between January 1, 2017, and February 29, 2020) and to human clinical studies (including controlled clinical trials and randomized controlled trials) investigating dimensional changes in alveolar sockets after various ARP techniques with outcomes measured from 3 to 6 months postoperatively. A total of 31 articles were reviewed, with approximately half of the selected studies using bovine (14) bone substitutes. Other biomaterials used in the studies included porcine bone substitutes, allografts (both freeze-dried and solvent-dehydrated), alloplasts (biphasic calcium phosphate, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite), biologics (platelet-rich fibrin and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2), collagen and high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membranes, and micro-titanium stent. Summary: Collagenated deproteinized bovine bone matrix (DBBM-C) was the most studied biomaterial in the past 3 years. Most studies showed DBBM-C plus barrier membranes resulted in comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes with DBBM and allografts. Consistent with previous studies, most of the ARP procedures reviewed in this article demonstrated effective reduction of alveolar ridge dimensional changes. Based on the selected articles and recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis, ARP procedure using bovine and porcine xenografts, as well as allografts, in conjunction with either collagen membranes or high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membranes gives similar results and should be considered when indicated. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 233
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RIDGE PRESERVATION
    Cutler, Erin
    APPALACHIAN HERITAGE-A LITERARY QUARTERLY OF THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS, 2009, 37 (02): : 45 - 47
  • [22] The Decision-Making Process for Ridge Preservation Procedures After Tooth Extraction
    Frost, Natalie A.
    Banjar, Arwa A.
    Galloway, Patrick B.
    Huynh-Ba, Guy
    Mealey, Brian L.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2014, 4 (01): : 56 - 63
  • [23] Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Bone Changes Following Ridge Preservation Procedures
    Clozza, Emanuele
    Biasotto, Matteo
    Cavalli, Fabio
    Moimas, Loredana
    Di Lenarda, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (04) : 770 - 775
  • [24] REVIEW OF SURGICAL RIDGE AUGMENTATION PROCEDURES FOR THE ATROPHIED MANDIBLE
    VANSICKELS, JE
    MONTGOMERY, MT
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 51 (01): : 5 - 10
  • [25] A new method to standardize CBCT for quantitative evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation in the mandible: a case report and review of the literature
    Xia, Yang
    Xie, Lizhe
    Zhou, Yi
    Song, Tianxi
    Zhang, Feimin
    Gu, Ning
    REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS, 2015, 2 (04) : 251 - 260
  • [26] Preservation of hamstring tibial insertion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the current literature
    Ruffilli A.
    Traina F.
    Evangelisti G.
    Borghi R.
    Perna F.
    Faldini C.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2015, 99 (2) : 87 - 92
  • [27] Histomorphometric Results in Ridge Preservation Procedures Comparing Various Graft Materials in Extraction Sockets With Nongrafted Sockets in Humans: A Systematic Review
    Barallat, Lucia
    Ruiz-Magaz, Vanessa
    Levi, Paul A., Jr.
    Mareque-Bueno, Santiago
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Nart, Jose
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (05) : 539 - 554
  • [28] Fertility preservation in oncology patients: A literature review examining current fertility preservation techniques and access to oncofertility services in Australia
    Robson, Danielle
    Phua, Cheryl
    Howard, Robyn
    Marren, Anthony
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 60 (01): : 18 - 26
  • [29] A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: hard tissue profile
    Lambert, France
    Vincent, Kim
    Vanhoutte, Vanessa
    Seidel, Laurence
    Lecloux, Geoffrey
    Rompen, Eric
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 (09) : 887 - 894
  • [30] Alveolar ridge preservation with autogenous tooth graft: A histomorphometric analysis of 36 consecutive procedures
    Beca-Campoy, Tomas
    Sanchez-Labrador, Luis
    Blanco-Antona, Leticia Alejandra
    Brinkmann, Jorge Cortes-Breton
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Jose Maria
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2025, 258