Ecological traits interact with landscape context to determine bees’ pesticide risk

被引:0
|
作者
Jessica L. Knapp
Charlie C. Nicholson
Ove Jonsson
Joachim R. de Miranda
Maj Rundlöf
机构
[1] Lund University,Department of Biology
[2] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, SLU Centre for Pesticides in the Environment
[3] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Department of Ecology
[4] Trinity College Dublin,Department of Botany
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Widespread contamination of ecosystems with pesticides threatens non-target organisms. However, the extent to which life-history traits affect pesticide exposure and resulting risk in different landscape contexts remains poorly understood. We address this for bees across an agricultural land-use gradient based on pesticide assays of pollen and nectar collected by Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis, representing extensive, intermediate and limited foraging traits. We found that extensive foragers (A. mellifera) experienced the highest pesticide risk—additive toxicity-weighted concentrations. However, only intermediate (B. terrestris) and limited foragers (O. bicornis) responded to landscape context—experiencing lower pesticide risk with less agricultural land. Pesticide risk correlated among bee species and between food sources and was greatest in A. mellifera-collected pollen—useful information for future postapproval pesticide monitoring. We provide foraging trait- and landscape-dependent information on the occurrence, concentration and identity of pesticides that bees encounter to estimate pesticide risk, which is necessary for more realistic risk assessment and essential information for tracking policy goals to reduce pesticide risk.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 556
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agricultural Urbanism in the Context of Landscape Ecological Architecture
    Maltseva, I. N.
    Kaganovich, N. N.
    Mindiyrova, T. N.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOSPHERE SAFETY (ICCATS 2017), 2017, 262
  • [22] SolBeePopecotox: A Population Model for Pesticide Risk Assessments of Solitary Bees
    Schmolke, Amelie
    Galic, Nika
    Roeben, Vanessa
    Preuss, Thomas G.
    Miles, Mark
    Hinarejos, Silvia
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2024, : 2645 - 2661
  • [23] Use of the Pesticide Toxicity Index to Determine Potential Ecological Risk in the Santiago-Guadalajara River Basin, Mexico
    de Anda, José
    Shear, Harvey
    Lugo-Melchor, Ofelia Yadira
    Padilla-Tovar, Luis Eduardo
    Bravo, Sandra Daniela
    Olvera-Vargas, Luis Alberto
    Water (Switzerland), 2024, 16 (20)
  • [24] Memory-guided foraging and landscape design interact to determine ecosystem services
    MacQueen, Sarah A.
    Braun, W. John
    Tyson, Rebecca C.
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 534
  • [25] Ecological relevance in honeybee pesticide risk assessment: developing context-dependent scenarios to manage uncertainty
    Henry, Mickael
    Decourtye, Axel
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [26] Mapping ecological risk of agricultural pesticide runoff
    Schriever, Carola Alexandra
    Liess, Matthias
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 384 (1-3) : 264 - 279
  • [27] Influence of landscape context on the abundance and diversity of bees in Mediterranean olive groves
    Tscheulin, T.
    Neokosmidis, L.
    Petanidou, T.
    Settele, J.
    BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 101 (05) : 557 - 564
  • [28] Do local and landscape context affect the attractiveness of flower gardens to bees?
    Eldridge, Devon S.
    Khalil, Amani
    Moulton, John K.
    Russo, Laura
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):
  • [29] Landscape perspectives on ecological risk assessment
    Richards, C
    Johnson, LB
    RISK ASSESSMENT: LOGIC AND MEASUREMENT, 1998, : 255 - 274
  • [30] A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees: questioning the ecological relevance
    Guez, David
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 4