Intraspecific Variation and Interspecific Differences in the Bacterial and Fungal Assemblages of Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and Great Tit (Parus major) Nests

被引:0
|
作者
Anne E. Goodenough
Bethan Stallwood
机构
[1] University of Gloucestershire,Department of Natural and Social Sciences, Francis Close Hall Campus
来源
Microbial Ecology | 2010年 / 59卷
关键词
Discriminant Function Analysis; Microbial Load; Discriminant Function Analysis; Cladosporium Cladosporioides; Cladosporium Herbarum;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although interest in the relationship between birds and microorganisms is increasing, few studies have compared nest microbial assemblages in wild passerines to determine variation within and between species. Culturing microorganisms from blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tit (Parus major) nests from the same study site demonstrated diverse microbial communities with 32 bacterial and 13 fungal species being isolated. Dominant bacteria were Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus hyicus. Also common in the nests were the keratinolytic bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri and Bacillus subtilis. Dominant fungi were Cladosporium herbarum and Epicoccum purpurascens. Aspergillus flavous, Microsporum gallinae, and Candida albicans (causative agents of avian aspergillosis, favus, and candidiasis, respectively) were present in 30%, 25%, and 10% of nests, respectively. Although there were no differences in nest mass or materials, bacterial (but not fungal) loads were significantly higher in blue tit nests. Microbial species also differed interspecifically. As regards potential pathogens, the prevalence of Enterobacter cloacae was higher in blue tit nests, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa—present in 30% of blue tit nests—was absent from great tit nests. The allergenic fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides was both more prevalent and abundant in great tit nests. Using discriminant function analysis (DFA), nests were classified to avian species with 100% accuracy using the complete microbial community. Partial DFA models were created using a reduced number of variables and compared using Akaike’s information criterion on the basis of model fit and parsimony. The best models classified unknown nests with 72.5–95% accuracy using a small subset of microbes (n = 1–8), which always included Pseudomonas agarici. This suggests that despite substantial intraspecific variation in nest microflora, there are significant interspecific differences—both in terms of individual microbes and the overall microbial community—even when host species are closely related, ecologically similar, sympatric, and construct very similar nests.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 232
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraspecific Variation and Interspecific Differences in the Bacterial and Fungal Assemblages of Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and Great Tit (Parus major) Nests
    Goodenough, Anne E.
    Stallwood, Bethan
    [J]. MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 59 (02) : 221 - 232
  • [2] Habitat geology influences intraspecific variation in the speckling patterns of Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus and Great Tit Parus major eggs
    Briggs, Kevin B.
    Mainwaring, Mark C.
    [J]. ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2017, 52 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [3] Consequences of experimental changes in the rearing conditions of Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus and Great Tit Parus major nestlings
    Banbura, Jerzy
    Banbura, Miroslawa
    Gladalski, Michal
    Kalinski, Adam
    Marciniak, Barbara
    Markowski, Marcin
    Michalski, Marek
    Nadolski, Jerzy
    Skwarska, Joanna
    Wawrzyniak, Jaroslaw
    Zielinski, Piotr
    [J]. ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2013, 48 (02) : 129 - 139
  • [4] Environmental factors shape cloacal bacterial assemblages in great tit Parus major and blue tit P-caeruleus nestlings
    Lucas, FS
    Heeb, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 2005, 36 (06) : 510 - 516
  • [5] Variation in growth in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus)
    Bjorklund, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1997, 10 (02) : 139 - 155
  • [6] Predation by snakes on eggs and nestlings of Great Tit Parus major and Blue Tit P-caeruleus
    Sorace, A
    Consiglio, C
    Tanda, F
    Lanzuisi, E
    Cattaneo, A
    Iavicoli, D
    [J]. IBIS, 2000, 142 (02) : 328 - 330
  • [7] Comparing prey composition and prey size delivered to nestlings by great tit, Parus major, and blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus, in a Mediterranean sclerophyllous mixed forest
    Navalpotro, H.
    Pagani-Nunez, E.
    Hernandez-Gomez, S.
    Senar, J. C.
    [J]. ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 39 (01) : 129 - 139
  • [8] Food diversity and niche-overlap of sympatric tits (Great Tit, Parus major, Blue Tit, Cyanistes caeruleus and Coal Tit Periparus ater) in the Hyrcanian Plain Forests
    Sehhatisabet, Mohammad E.
    Kiabi, Bahram
    Pazuki, Ali
    Alipanah, Helen
    Khaleghizadeh, Abdolghassem
    Barari, Hasan
    Basiri, Reza
    Aghabeigi, Fatemeh
    [J]. ZOOLOGY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, 2008, 44 : 17 - 30
  • [9] THE EFFECTS OF PROVISION OF FOOD IN WINTER ON A POPULATION OF THE GREAT TIT PARUS MAJOR AND THE BLUE TIT P- PARUS-CAERULEUS
    KALLANDER, H
    [J]. ORNIS SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 12 (03): : 244 - 248
  • [10] HABITAT AND LAYING DATE OF GREAT AND BLUE TIT PARUS-MAJOR AND PARUS-CAERULEUS
    DHONDT, AA
    EYCKERMAN, R
    MOERMANS, R
    HUBLE, J
    [J]. IBIS, 1984, 126 (03) : 388 - 397