Food diversity and niche-overlap of sympatric tits (Great Tit, Parus major, Blue Tit, Cyanistes caeruleus and Coal Tit Periparus ater) in the Hyrcanian Plain Forests

被引:0
|
作者
Sehhatisabet, Mohammad E. [1 ]
Kiabi, Bahram [2 ]
Pazuki, Ali [3 ]
Alipanah, Helen [3 ]
Khaleghizadeh, Abdolghassem [4 ]
Barari, Hasan [3 ]
Basiri, Reza [5 ]
Aghabeigi, Fatemeh [6 ]
机构
[1] Kerman Prov Off, Dept Environm, Kerman, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Biol, Fac Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iranian Res Inst Plant Protect, Insect Taxon Res Dept, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iranian Res Inst Plant Protect, Agr Zool Res Dept, Ornithol Lab, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Chamran Univ, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Forestry, Ahvaz, Iran
[6] Iranian Res Inst Plant Protect, Bot Res Dept, High Plants Lab, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Paridae; feeding; niche-overlap; Hyrcanian forest; Iran; Middle East;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
This study was carried out between early summer 1998 and late summer 1999 in the Hyrcanian Plain forests, the southern Caspian Sea woodlands. In total, the gizzard contents of 241 specimens of the Great Tit (Parus major Linnaeus, 1758), Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus Linnacus, 1758), and Coal Tit (Periparus ater (Linnaeus, 1758)) were collected so that the percentages of grit, plants and animal materials could be estimated and the plant and invertebrate species consumed identified. The data were tested by a series of Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. To survey niche overlap of food materials between species and season, the symmetrical overlap index developed by PIANKA (1973) was used. The most important invertebrates (maximum of percentage per season) in the diet of P. major were Coleoptera (36.5%) and Lepidoptera (33.6%), for C. caeruleus Coleoptera (34.5%) and Araneae (3 1.2%), and for Pe. ater Coleoptera (38.2%) and Araneae (35.6%). The most important plants consumed by P. major were Sorghum halepense (68.7%) and Ficus carica (65.6%), by C. caeruleus were F. carica (67.5%) and Alnus glutinosa (39.4%), and by Pe. ater were Lonicera spp. (82.9%). There was a greater degree of overlap and competition for animal food, but plant feeding overlap among the three tit species was low. Two species, P. major and C caeruleus, showed high feeding overlap for animal items (0.92), whereas Pe. afer and C. caeruleus had no significant feeding overlap. The Coal Tit had a greater tendency to forage for vegetable matter and P. maior had a greater tendency to forage for animal matter. Analysis of gizzard contents of P. major and Pe. ater showed that, despite the high degree of feeding overlap, the extent of plant materials consumed indicated no significant competition between the two species. Because Pe. ater is present mostly in autumn and winter, this study cannot establish any degree of competition and food-niche overlap during the breeding season between this and other tit species.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 30
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Consequences of experimental changes in the rearing conditions of Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus and Great Tit Parus major nestlings
    Banbura, Jerzy
    Banbura, Miroslawa
    Gladalski, Michal
    Kalinski, Adam
    Marciniak, Barbara
    Markowski, Marcin
    Michalski, Marek
    Nadolski, Jerzy
    Skwarska, Joanna
    Wawrzyniak, Jaroslaw
    Zielinski, Piotr
    [J]. ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2013, 48 (02) : 129 - 139
  • [2] Intraspecific Variation and Interspecific Differences in the Bacterial and Fungal Assemblages of Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and Great Tit (Parus major) Nests
    Goodenough, Anne E.
    Stallwood, Bethan
    [J]. MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 59 (02) : 221 - 232
  • [3] Habitat geology influences intraspecific variation in the speckling patterns of Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus and Great Tit Parus major eggs
    Briggs, Kevin B.
    Mainwaring, Mark C.
    [J]. ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2017, 52 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [4] Intraspecific Variation and Interspecific Differences in the Bacterial and Fungal Assemblages of Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and Great Tit (Parus major) Nests
    Anne E. Goodenough
    Bethan Stallwood
    [J]. Microbial Ecology, 2010, 59 : 221 - 232
  • [5] Object Permanence in the Food-Storing Coal Tit (Periparus ater) and the Non-Storing Great Tit (Parus major): Is the Mental Representation Required?
    Marhounova, Lucie
    Frynta, Damel
    Fuchs, Roman
    Landova, Eva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 131 (02) : 115 - 127
  • [6] THE EFFECTS OF PROVISION OF FOOD IN WINTER ON A POPULATION OF THE GREAT TIT PARUS MAJOR AND THE BLUE TIT P- PARUS-CAERULEUS
    KALLANDER, H
    [J]. ORNIS SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 12 (03): : 244 - 248
  • [7] Predation by snakes on eggs and nestlings of Great Tit Parus major and Blue Tit P-caeruleus
    Sorace, A
    Consiglio, C
    Tanda, F
    Lanzuisi, E
    Cattaneo, A
    Iavicoli, D
    [J]. IBIS, 2000, 142 (02) : 328 - 330
  • [8] Comparing prey composition and prey size delivered to nestlings by great tit, Parus major, and blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus, in a Mediterranean sclerophyllous mixed forest
    Navalpotro, H.
    Pagani-Nunez, E.
    Hernandez-Gomez, S.
    Senar, J. C.
    [J]. ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 39 (01) : 129 - 139
  • [9] Etho-ecological study of the singing activity of the Blue Tit (Parus caeruleus), Great Tit (Parus major) and Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs).
    Bergen, F
    Abs, M
    [J]. JOURNAL FUR ORNITHOLOGIE, 1997, 138 (04): : 451 - 467
  • [10] Coal Tits Periparus ater build larger nests than Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus and Great Tits Parus major living in the same Mediterranean coniferous woodland habitat
    Lambrechts, Marcel M.
    Haurez, Jacques
    Bodineau, Gerard
    Gagliardi, Gilbert
    Maistre, Marie
    Perret, Philippe
    Pihan, Pierre
    Wilhelm, Bernard
    Wilhelm, Josette
    Bernard, Cyril
    Blondel, Jacques
    [J]. ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2016, 51 (01) : 123 - 129