Model errors caused by rigid-foundation assumption in soil-structure interaction: a comparison of responses of a soil-structure-flexible foundation system and a rigid foundation system

This study investigates model errors caused by the rigid-foundation assumption in dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI), which has been widely accepted in the past decades to reduce computational effort. A linear two-dimensional model is used for a qualitative analysis that compares the dynamic responses of a rigid system, comprising a rigid foundation embedded in a layered half-space with a superstructure mounted on top, and a corresponding flexible system with the same parameters but a flexible foundation with a variable stiffness. The Indirect Boundary Element Method combined with non-singular Green’s functions of distributed line loads is employed to calculate the system responses accurately. Transfer functions computed for a range of parameters show that the rigid-foundation assumption leads to overestimating the system natural frequency and changes the peak deformations to a different extent. It is also shown through a case study of 42 earthquakes that the rigid-foundation assumption may either overestimate or underestimate the system responses by up to approximately 50%, and in some cases even by approximately 100%, depending on the frequency content of excitation and SSI dynamic characteristics.