Meta-analysis of measures of performance reported in oral cancer and precancer screening studies

被引:0
|
作者
Moles D.R. [1 ,4 ]
Downer M.C. [2 ,3 ]
Speight P.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oral Pathology, University College London
[2] Biostatistics Unit, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London
[3] Oral Health and Development, University Dental Hospital, Manchester
[4] Department of Oral Pathology, Eastman Dent. Inst. Oral Hlth. C., University College London, London WC1X 8LD
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4801370
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To elicit a range of values for sensitivity, specificity and other measures of performance in screening for oral cancer and precancer. Method: A literature search which included three databases was conducted. Strict inclusion criteria were applied. Values for sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp), from seven investigations, were expressed as a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Meta-analysis of the combined results was used to produce a summary operator characteristic (SROC) curve. Results: The pooled weighted value of Sn from the seven studies was 0.796. From the SROC, the corresponding value of Sp at this level of Sn was 0.977 (95% Cl 0.941, 0.991). When Sp was held at 0.977, the corresponding value of Sn from the SROC was 0.796 (95% Cl 0.594, 0.912). Conclusions: The reports selected for eventual inclusion revealed a high level of heterogeneity with respect to the location of investigations, prevalence of lesions, the personnel used and other factors. The meta-analysis indicated that overall the studies had high discriminatory ability. The estimates of Sn and Sp, and values obtained for other measures of screening performance, were considered suitable for input to a simulation model in assessing the likely cost-utility of a variety of screening scenarios in further planned research.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 344
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Balitsky, Amaris K.
    Rayner, Daniel
    Britto, Joanne
    Lionel, Anath C.
    Ginsberg, Lydia
    Cho, Wanjae
    Wilfred, Ann Mary
    Sardar, Huda
    Cantor, Nathan
    Mian, Hira
    Levine, Mark N.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (08)
  • [22] EVALUATION OF SCREENING FOR ORAL-CANCER AND PRECANCER IN A COMPANY HEADQUARTERS
    DOWNER, MC
    EVANS, AW
    HUGHES, HCM
    JULLIEN, JA
    SPEIGHT, PM
    ZAKRZEWSKA, JM
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 23 (02) : 84 - 88
  • [23] UK WORKING GROUP ON SCREENING FOR ORAL-CANCER AND PRECANCER
    DOWNER, MC
    SPEIGHT, P
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1991, 170 (08) : 313 - 313
  • [24] The inclusion of partially reported studies in a Bayesian meta-analysis
    Barry, D
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2003, 115 (02) : 365 - 378
  • [25] Identification of risk groups for oral precancer and cancer and preventive measures.
    Reichart P.A.
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2001, 5 (4) : 207 - 213
  • [26] Alcohol screening and assessment measures for young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies
    Toner, Paul
    Bohnke, Jan R.
    Andersen, Phil
    McCambridge, Jim
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2019, 202 : 39 - 49
  • [27] Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance studies
    M. G. Myriam Hunink
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2013, 28 : 711 - 712
  • [28] Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance studies
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 28 (09) : 711 - 712
  • [29] Periodontitis and the risk of oral cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control studies
    Ma, Yan
    Tuerxun, Nijiati
    Maimaitili, Gulibaha
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 83 : 281 - 289
  • [30] Response to Population screening for prostate cancer: An overview of available studies and meta-analysis
    Van Meerhaeghe, Alain
    Velkeniers, Brigitte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : 591 - 591