The importance of repairing stalled replication forks

被引:0
|
作者
Michael M. Cox
Myron F. Goodman
Kenneth N. Kreuzer
David J. Sherratt
Steven J. Sandler
Kenneth J. Marians
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin-Madison,Department of Biochemistry
[2] University of Southern California,Departments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry
[3] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Microbiology
[4] University of Oxford,Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Biochemistry
[5] University of Massachusetts,Department of Microbiology
[6] Molecular Biology Program,undefined
[7] Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Nature | 2000年 / 404卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The bacterial SOS response to unusual levels of DNA damage has been recognized and studied for several decades. Pathways for re-establishing inactivated replication forks under normal growth conditions have received far less attention. In bacteria growing aerobically in the absence of SOS-inducing conditions, many replication forks encounter DNA damage, leading to inactivation. The pathways for fork reactivation involve the homologous recombination systems, are nonmutagenic, and integrate almost every aspect of DNA metabolism. On a frequency-of-use basis, these pathways represent the main function of bacterial DNA recombination systems, as well as the main function of a number of other enzymatic systems that are associated with replication and site-specific recombination.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks
    Ryan C. Heller
    Kenneth J. Marians
    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2006, 7 : 932 - 943
  • [22] Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks
    Sirbu, Bianca M.
    Couch, Frank B.
    Feigerle, Jordan T.
    Bhaskara, Srividya
    Hiebert, Scott W.
    Cortez, David
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 25 (12) : 1320 - 1327
  • [23] DisA Limits RecG Activities at Stalled or Reversed Replication Forks
    Torres, Ruben
    Gandara, Carolina
    Carrasco, Begona
    Baquedano, Ignacio
    Ayora, Silvia
    Alonso, Juan C.
    CELLS, 2021, 10 (06)
  • [24] A protective role for BRCA2 at stalled replication forks
    Gurushankar Chandramouly
    Nicholas A Willis
    Ralph Scully
    Breast Cancer Research, 13
  • [25] DNA Replication: Pif1 Pulls the Plug on Stalled Replication Forks
    Shimada, Kenji
    Gasser, Susan M.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (10) : R404 - R405
  • [26] A step backward in advancing DNA replication: Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG
    Dillingham, MS
    Kowalczykowski, SC
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2001, 8 (04) : 734 - 736
  • [27] Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human PrimPol
    Silvana Mourón
    Sara Rodriguez-Acebes
    María I Martínez-Jiménez
    Sara García-Gómez
    Sandra Chocrón
    Luis Blanco
    Juan Méndez
    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2013, 20 : 1383 - 1389
  • [28] A protective role for BRCA2 at stalled replication forks
    Chandramouly, Gurushankar
    Willis, Nicholas A.
    Scully, Ralph
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (05):
  • [29] FANCM regulates repair pathway choice at stalled replication forks
    Panday, Arvind
    Willis, Nicholas A.
    Elango, Rajula
    Menghi, Francesca
    Duffey, Erin E.
    Liu, Edison T.
    Scully, Ralph
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2021, 81 (11) : 2428 - +
  • [30] Stalled replication forks: Making ends meet for recognition and stabilization
    Masai, Hisao
    Tanaka, Taku
    Kohda, Daisuke
    BIOESSAYS, 2010, 32 (08) : 687 - 697