Translational science: a survey of US biomedical researchers’ perspectives and practices

被引:0
|
作者
Rebecca L. Walker
Katherine W. Saylor
Margaret Waltz
Jill A. Fisher
机构
[1] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Department of Social Medicine
[2] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Department of Philosophy
[3] University of Pennsylvania,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy
来源
Lab Animal | 2022年 / 51卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This national survey aimed to identify how biomedical researchers using vertebrate animals viewed issues of significance for translational science, including oversight and public engagement, and to analyze how researcher characteristics and animal model choice correlate with those views. Responses from 1,187 researchers showed awareness of, and concerns about, problems of translation, reproducibility and rigor. Surveyed scientists were nevertheless optimistic about the value of animal studies, were favorable about research oversight and reported openness with non-scientists in discussing their animal work. Differences in survey responses among researchers also point to diverse perspectives within the animal research community on these matters. Most significant was variability associated with the primary type of animal that surveyed scientists used in their work. Other significant divergence in opinion appeared on the basis of professional role factors, including the type of degree held, workplace setting, type of funding, experience on an institutional animal care and use committee and personal demographic characteristics of age and gender.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 35
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] US undervalues foreign researchers, survey reveals
    Rex Dalton
    Nature, 2005, 434 : 426 - 426
  • [22] Researchers’ views on and practices of knowledge translation: an international survey of transfusion medicine researchers
    Thijsen A.
    Masser B.
    Davison T.E.
    Williamson A.
    Implementation Science Communications, 5 (1):
  • [23] Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China
    Yi, Nannan
    Nemery, Benoit
    Dierickx, Kris
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [24] Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China
    Nannan Yi
    Benoit Nemery
    Kris Dierickx
    BMC Medical Ethics, 21
  • [25] The connection of open science practices and the methodological approach of researchers
    Steinhardt I.
    Bauer M.
    Wünsche H.
    Schimmler S.
    Quality & Quantity, 2023, 57 (4) : 3621 - 3636
  • [26] Sphingolipidomics in Translational Sepsis Research-Biomedical Considerations and Perspectives
    Claus, Ralf A.
    Graeler, Markus H.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 7
  • [27] Translational researchers' training and development needs, preferences, and barriers: A survey in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in the United Kingdom
    Bell, Karen
    Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar
    Henderson, Lorna R.
    Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 15 (07): : 1737 - 1752
  • [28] Incentives to Open Access: Perspectives of Health Science Researchers
    Lopez-Vergara, Carmen
    Flores Asenjo, Pilar
    Rosa-Garcia, Alfonso
    PUBLICATIONS, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [29] Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of US Biomedical Researchers, 1996 to 2022
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Hozo, Iztok
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (12) : E2245590
  • [30] Russian and US researchers develop 'biochips' for faster, inexpensive biomedical tests
    Skolnick, AA
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (08): : 581 - 582