Comparisons between multi-component myelin water fraction, T1w/T2w ratio, and diffusion tensor imaging measures in healthy human brain structures

被引:0
|
作者
Md. Nasir Uddin
Teresa D. Figley
Kevin G. Solar
Anwar S. Shatil
Chase R. Figley
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Department of Radiology
[2] Health Sciences Centre,Division of Diagnostic Imaging
[3] Kleysen Institute for Advanced Medicine,Neuroscience Research Program
[4] University of Manitoba,Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology
[5] University of Manitoba,Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program
[6] Johns Hopkins University,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Various MRI techniques, including myelin water imaging, T1w/T2w ratio mapping and diffusion-based imaging can be used to characterize tissue microstructure. However, surprisingly few studies have examined the degree to which these MRI measures are related within and between various brain regions. Therefore, whole-brain MRI scans were acquired from 31 neurologically-healthy participants to empirically measure and compare myelin water fraction (MWF), T1w/T2w ratio, fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD) and mean diffusivity (MD) in 25 bilateral (10 grey matter; 15 white matter) regions-of-interest (ROIs). Except for RD vs. T1w/T2w, MD vs. T1w/T2w, moderately significant to highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found between each of the other measures across all 25 brain structures [T1w/T2w vs. MWF (Pearson r = 0.33, Spearman ρ = 0.31), FA vs. MWF (r = 0.73, ρ = 0.75), FA vs. T1w/T2w (r = 0.25, ρ = 0.22), MD vs. AD (r = 0.57, ρ = 0.58), MD vs. RD (r = 0.64, ρ = 0.61), AD vs. MWF (r = 0.43, ρ = 0.36), RD vs. MWF (r = −0.49, ρ = −0.62), MD vs. MWF (r = −0.22, ρ = −0.29), RD vs. FA (r = −0.62, ρ = −0.75) and MD vs. FA (r = −0.22, ρ = −0.18)]. However, while all six MRI measures were correlated with each other across all structures, there were large intra-ROI and inter-ROI differences (i.e., with no one measure consistently producing the highest or lowest values). This suggests that each quantitative MRI measure provides unique, and potentially complimentary, information about underlying brain tissues – with each metric offering unique sensitivity/specificity tradeoffs to different microstructural properties (e.g., myelin content, tissue density, etc.).
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Structural Covariance of Depth-Dependent Intracortical Myelination in the Human Brain and Its Application to Drug-Naive Schizophrenia: A T1w/T2w MRI Study
    Wei, Wei
    Yin, Yubing
    Zhang, Yamin
    Li, Xiaojing
    Li, Mingli
    Guo, Wanjun
    Wang, Qiang
    Deng, Wei
    Ma, Xiaohong
    Zhao, Liansheng
    Palaniyappan, Lena
    Li, Tao
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2022, 32 (11) : 2373 - 2384
  • [22] Deep learning of joint myelin and T1w MRI features in normal-appearing brain tissue to distinguish between multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls
    Yoo, Youngjin
    Tang, Lisa Y. W.
    Brosch, Tom
    Li, David K. B.
    Kolind, Shannon
    Vavasour, Irene
    Rauscher, Alexander
    MacKay, Alex L.
    Traboulsee, Anthony
    Tam, Roger C.
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2018, 17 : 169 - 178