Moral transparency of and concerning algorithmic tools

被引:0
|
作者
Paul Hayes
Ibo van de Poel
Marc Steen
机构
[1] Technological University Dublin,SFI ADAPT Research Centre and Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media
[2] Trilateral Research Ltd.,Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, Values Technology and Innovation
[3] TU Delft,undefined
[4] Human Behaviour and Organisational Innovations,undefined
[5] TNO,undefined
来源
AI and Ethics | 2023年 / 3卷 / 2期
关键词
AI; Algorithms; Transparency; Ethics; Values;
D O I
10.1007/s43681-022-00190-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Algorithms and AI tools are becoming increasingly influential artefacts in commercial and governance contexts. Algorithms and AI tools are not value neutral; to some extent they must be rendered knowable and known as objects, and in their implementation and deployment, to see clearly and understand their implications for moral values, and what actions can be undertaken to optimise them in their design and use towards ethical goals, or whether they are even suitable for particular goals. Transparency is a term with variable uses and interpretations, a problem which can challenge its use in design and policy. Here, we attempt to further clarify transparency. We argue that transparency is the state of affairs that obtains when relevant and understandable information about some X is available and accessible to some target audience (A), so that this information is sufficient for A for the purpose (P). Moreover, we connect this conceptualisation with transparency’s moral value, where P is to provide an account about X’s supportive or conflicting relationship with relevant values and goals. Such teleological ends in our context here can be the ability to account for the degree to which an algorithm, process or organisation respects certain values and is conducive to (social) goals.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 600
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Concerning "moral insanity"
    Longard, J
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR PSYCHIATRIE UND NERVENKRANKHEITEN, 1907, 43 (01): : 135 - 233
  • [32] Attention, moral skill, and algorithmic recommendation
    Schuster, Nick
    Lazar, Seth
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2024,
  • [33] CONCERNING MORAL ABSOLUTES
    BOUGHTON, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1958, 55 (08): : 309 - 317
  • [34] Procedural justice in algorithmic fairness: Leveraging transparency and outcome control for fair algorithmic mediation
    Lee, Min Kyung
    Jain, Anuraag
    Cha, Hae J.I.N.
    Ojha, Shashank
    Kusbit, Daniel
    [J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, 3 (CSCW)
  • [35] Moral Transparency as a Mitigator of Moral Bias in Conversational User Interfaces
    Wester, Joel
    Lee, Minha
    van Berkel, Niels
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONVERSATIONAL USER INTERFACES, CUI 2023, 2023,
  • [36] Algorithmic tools for tripartite data analysis
    Charles A Phillips
    Erich J Baker
    Elissa J Chesler
    Michael A Langston
    [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 15 (Suppl 10)
  • [37] Special Issue: Algorithmic Tools in Cryptography
    Garay, Juan A.
    Ostrovsky, Rafail
    [J]. ALGORITHMICA, 2017, 79 (04) : 985 - 986
  • [38] Platform Governance in China: Antitrust Issues and Algorithmic Transparency
    Sung, Huang-Chih
    [J]. MANCHESTER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2023, 20 (02): : 266 - 298
  • [39] Algorithmic Transparency of Large-Scale *AIDA Programs
    Watanobe, Yutaka
    Mirenkov, Nikolay
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2020, 30 (09) : 1263 - 1288
  • [40] Understanding the Impact of Transparency on Algorithmic Decision Making Legitimacy
    Goad, David
    Gal, Uri
    [J]. LIVING WITH MONSTERS?: SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF ALGORITHMIC PHENOMENA, HYBRID AGENCY, AND THE PERFORMATIVITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 543 : 64 - 79