Moral transparency of and concerning algorithmic tools

被引:0
|
作者
Paul Hayes
Ibo van de Poel
Marc Steen
机构
[1] Technological University Dublin,SFI ADAPT Research Centre and Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media
[2] Trilateral Research Ltd.,Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, Values Technology and Innovation
[3] TU Delft,undefined
[4] Human Behaviour and Organisational Innovations,undefined
[5] TNO,undefined
来源
AI and Ethics | 2023年 / 3卷 / 2期
关键词
AI; Algorithms; Transparency; Ethics; Values;
D O I
10.1007/s43681-022-00190-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Algorithms and AI tools are becoming increasingly influential artefacts in commercial and governance contexts. Algorithms and AI tools are not value neutral; to some extent they must be rendered knowable and known as objects, and in their implementation and deployment, to see clearly and understand their implications for moral values, and what actions can be undertaken to optimise them in their design and use towards ethical goals, or whether they are even suitable for particular goals. Transparency is a term with variable uses and interpretations, a problem which can challenge its use in design and policy. Here, we attempt to further clarify transparency. We argue that transparency is the state of affairs that obtains when relevant and understandable information about some X is available and accessible to some target audience (A), so that this information is sufficient for A for the purpose (P). Moreover, we connect this conceptualisation with transparency’s moral value, where P is to provide an account about X’s supportive or conflicting relationship with relevant values and goals. Such teleological ends in our context here can be the ability to account for the degree to which an algorithm, process or organisation respects certain values and is conducive to (social) goals.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 600
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Moral Violation on Algorithmic Transparency: An Empirical Investigation
    Shah, Muhammad Umair
    Rehman, Umair
    Parmar, Bidhan
    Ismail, Inara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2024, 193 (01) : 19 - 34
  • [2] TRANSPARENCY AND ALGORITHMIC GOVERNANCE
    Coglianese, Cary
    Lehr, David
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2019, 71 (01) : 1 - 56
  • [3] Algorithmic Transparency and Manipulation
    Klenk M.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2023, 36 (4)
  • [4] Good Explanation for Algorithmic Transparency
    Lu, Joy
    Lee, Dokyun
    Kim, Tae Wan
    Danks, David
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY AIES 2020, 2020, : 93 - 93
  • [5] Algorithmic Transparency with Strategic Users
    Wang, Qiaochu
    Huang, Yan
    Jasin, Stefanus
    Singh, Param Vir
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (04) : 2297 - 2317
  • [6] Transparency in Algorithmic Decision Making
    Rauber, Andreas
    Trasarti, Roberto
    Giannotti, Fosca
    [J]. ERCIM NEWS, 2019, (116): : 10 - 11
  • [7] ALGORITHMIC TRANSPARENCY IN THE NEWS MEDIA
    Diakopoulos, Nicholas
    Koliska, Michael
    [J]. DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2017, 5 (07) : 809 - 828
  • [8] Data Mining with Algorithmic Transparency
    Zhou, Yan
    Alufaisan, Yasmeen
    Kantarcioglu, Murat
    [J]. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PAKDD 2018, PT I, 2018, 10937 : 130 - 142
  • [9] Toward Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability
    Garfinkel, Simson
    Matthews, Jeanna
    Shapiro, Stuart S.
    Smith, Jonathan M.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2017, 60 (09) : 5 - 5
  • [10] Transparency as Manipulation? Uncovering the Disciplinary Power of Algorithmic Transparency
    Wang H.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2022, 35 (3)