Pareto-Optimal Multi-objective Inversion of Geophysical Data

被引:0
|
作者
Sebastian Schnaidt
Dennis Conway
Lars Krieger
Graham Heinson
机构
[1] Deep Exploration Technologies Cooperative Research Centre,Electrical Earth Imaging Group, Department of Earth Sciences, School of Physical Sciences
[2] University of Adelaide,undefined
[3] Institute for Geothermal Resource Management,undefined
来源
关键词
Multi-objective optimisation; joint-inversion; data set compatibility; model uncertainty; magnetotellurics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the process of modelling geophysical properties, jointly inverting different data sets can greatly improve model results, provided that the data sets are compatible, i.e., sensitive to similar features. Such a joint inversion requires a relationship between the different data sets, which can either be analytic or structural. Classically, the joint problem is expressed as a scalar objective function that combines the misfit functions of multiple data sets and a joint term which accounts for the assumed connection between the data sets. This approach suffers from two major disadvantages: first, it can be difficult to assess the compatibility of the data sets and second, the aggregation of misfit terms introduces a weighting of the data sets. We present a pareto-optimal multi-objective joint inversion approach based on an existing genetic algorithm. The algorithm treats each data set as a separate objective, avoiding forced weighting and generating curves of the trade-off between the different objectives. These curves are analysed by their shape and evolution to evaluate data set compatibility. Furthermore, the statistical analysis of the generated solution population provides valuable estimates of model uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:2221 / 2236
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pareto-Optimal Multi-objective Inversion of Geophysical Data
    Schnaidt, Sebastian
    Conway, Dennis
    Krieger, Lars
    Heinson, Graham
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 175 (06) : 2221 - 2236
  • [2] Distributional Pareto-Optimal Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
    Cai, Xin-Qiang
    Zhang, Pushi
    Zhao, Li
    Bian, Jiang
    Sugiyama, Masashi
    Llorens, Ashley J.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [3] Searching for robust Pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization
    Deb, K
    Gupta, H
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 3410 : 150 - 164
  • [4] A multi-objective evolutionary approach to Pareto-optimal model trees
    Czajkowski, Marcin
    Kretowski, Marek
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (05) : 1423 - 1437
  • [5] A Pareto-optimal genetic algorithm for warehouse multi-objective optimization
    Poulos, PN
    Rigatos, GG
    Tzafestas, SG
    Koukos, AK
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 14 (06) : 737 - 749
  • [6] Pareto-optimal solutions in fuzzy multi-objective linear programming
    Jimenez, Mariano
    Bilbao, Amelia
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 160 (18) : 2714 - 2721
  • [7] A multi-objective evolutionary approach to Pareto-optimal model trees
    Marcin Czajkowski
    Marek Kretowski
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2019, 23 : 1423 - 1437
  • [8] Pareto-optimal solutions for multi-objective production scheduling problems
    Bagchi, TP
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 1993 : 458 - 471
  • [9] A Multi-Objective Pareto-Optimal Genetic Algorithm for QoS Multicasting
    Rai, S. C.
    Misra, B. B.
    Nayak, A. K.
    Mall, R.
    Pradhan, S.
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ADVANCE COMPUTING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 1303 - +
  • [10] Pareto-optimal solutions for multi-objective flexible linear programming
    Dubey, Dipti
    Mehra, Aparna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (01) : 535 - 546