Salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Charles Catton
Michael Milosevic
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto,Department of Radiation Oncology
来源
World Journal of Urology | 2003年 / 21卷
关键词
Salvage radiotherapy; Radical prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biochemical relapse will occur in 17–64% of men who undergo radical prostatectomy, and up to a third of men with biochemical relapse will progress to develop metastatic disease and ultimately die of prostate cancer. Postoperative salvage radiotherapy (RT) to the prostatic fossa is well-tolerated and potentially curative treatment and should be considered for all men who have biochemical relapse following prostatectomy. Gleason score <8, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time >10 months and PSA re-emergence >2 years following surgery predict for a low risk of early metastatic failure, but even men with no favourable prognostic factors may have a long-term durable response to RT and should not be excluded from consideration of treatment on the basis of these factors alone. Positive surgical margin status and a positive anastomotic biopsy do not predict response to RT, and routine biopsy is not recommended. PSA level at time of RT is a strong indicator of durable response to RT. No one PSA cutpoint level appears to be more significant, and early RT is likely more effective than late. Contemporary PSA assays can detect biochemical relapse in the 0.01–0.2 range, and this may provide additional therapeutic advantage if treatment can be given when tumour burden is smallest. There is an urgent need for prospective data from randomised trials to optimally select patients for salvage RT, to determine the optimal time to initiate treatment and to determine the role of adjuvant hormone therapy, and all patients should be considered for entry into ongoing and future clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 252
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Postoperative Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: Adjuvant or Salvage?
    Morgan, Scott C.
    Parker, Chris C.
    CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS, 2011, 7 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [32] Radical Prostatectomy: Adjuvant versus Salvage Radiotherapy Comment
    Lorenz, Judith
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2022, 53 (01) : 12 - 13
  • [33] Salvage radiotherapy for PSA failure after radical prostatectomy
    Parker, C
    Warde, P
    Catton, C
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (02) : 107 - 116
  • [34] SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PSA RELAPSE
    Witjes, J. A.
    Cremers, R.
    Gerrits, W. L. J.
    Van Lin, E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 307 - 307
  • [35] Salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Terai, A
    Matsui, Y
    Yoshimura, K
    Arai, Y
    Dodo, Y
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (07) : 1009 - 1013
  • [36] Salvage radiotherapy in rising PSA after radical prostatectomy
    Carrie, C.
    Pommier, P.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2007, 11 (6-7): : 370 - 372
  • [37] Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy
    Wiegel, T
    THREE-DIMENSIONAL RADIATION TREATMENT: TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND CLINICAL RESULTS, 2000, 34 : 145 - 151
  • [38] Undetectable PSA predicts outcome after salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy
    Scharl, Sophia
    Gartner, Luca
    Boehmer, Dirk Heinz Gerhard
    Siegmann, Alessandra
    Thamm, Reinhard
    Krafcsik, Manuel
    Mayer, Benjamin
    Zips, Daniel
    Ruf, Christian
    Wiegel, Thomas
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 200
  • [39] Elective pelvic versus prostate bed-only salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy
    Song, Changhoon
    Kang, Hyun-Cheol
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Eom, Keun-Yong
    Kim, In Ah
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (10) : 801 - 809
  • [40] Port site and peritoneal metastasis following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma
    Cano-Velasco, Jorge
    Herranz-Amo, F.
    Polanco Pujol, Lucia
    Barbas-Bernardos, G.
    Morelejo-Garate, M.
    Subira-Rios, D.
    Hernandez-Fernandez, C.
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (09): : 974 - 977