Self-interest and public opinion in health policy: smoking behavior and support for tobacco control

被引:0
|
作者
Andrew L. Spivak
Michael S. Givel
Shannon M. Monnat
机构
[1] University of Nevada,Department of Sociology
[2] Las Vegas,undefined
[3] The University of Oklahoma,undefined
[4] Syracuse University,undefined
来源
Social Theory & Health | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
Tobacco; Smoking; Tobacco taxes; Self-interest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the influence of self-interest on attitudes about public health policy, specifically the influence of smoking on opposition to tobacco control measures. We analyze the relationships between being a current smoker, former smoker, or nonsmoker and support for cigarette taxes and anti-tobacco health education campaigns in order to reveal the extent to which the direct “pocketbook” self-interest of health-related behaviors, versus general sociotropic values, influence public health policy opinions. Using a sample of 442 adult participants in a statewide survey, binary logistic regression and proportional odds models compare respondents’ support for varying amounts and allocation levels of cigarette taxes, as well as anti-tobacco health education campaigns, controlling for smoking status and demographic variables. Results indicate that the connection between being a current smoker and being less supportive of cigarette taxes (a policy that directly affects self-interest) is not mediated when controlling for attitudes about anti-tobacco education campaigns (a policy that does not as directly affect self-interest). However, while former smokers do not support cigarette taxes as much as do nonsmokers, their support for taxes becomes indistinguishable from that of nonsmokers when their attitudes about anti-tobacco education campaigns are considered. We conclude that both direct self-interest and broader social values influence tobacco control policy attitudes. Smokers appear to consider their pocketbooks, but simultaneously both current and former smokers are ideologically motivated to oppose health initiatives. Thus, public health policymakers should highlight the importance of public education and social norms in garnering support for tobacco control policies.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 43
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Group interest versus self-interest in smallpox vaccination policy
    Bauch, CT
    Galvani, AP
    Earn, DJD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (18) : 10564 - 10567
  • [32] Waterpipe tobacco smoking impact on public health: implications for policy
    Martinasek, Mary P.
    Gibson-Young, Linda M.
    Davis, Janiece N.
    McDermott, Robert J.
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2015, 8 : 121 - 129
  • [33] Enlightened self-interest and the control of tuberculosis
    Bloom, BR
    Salomon, JA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (10): : 1057 - 1059
  • [34] Using findings from a public opinion poll to build political support for tobacco control policy in Kenya
    Maina, William K.
    Kitonyo, Rachael
    Ogwell, Ahmed E. O.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2013, 22 (06) : 423 - 426
  • [35] Enlightened self-interest and public/private partnerships
    Slavkin, Harold C.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2012, 72 : S68 - S68
  • [36] WHERE PUBLIC SERVICE AND SELF-INTEREST MEET
    HOROWITZ, DJ
    AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1971, 57 (AUG): : 783 - 787
  • [37] NO MAN IS AN ISLAND: SELF-INTEREST, THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND SOCIOTROPIC VOTING
    Kiewiet, D. Roderick
    Lewis-Beck, Michael S.
    CRITICAL REVIEW, 2011, 23 (03) : 303 - 319
  • [38] Public attitudes towards smoking and tobacco control policy in Russia
    Danishevski, K.
    Gilmore, A.
    McKee, M.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2008, 17 (04) : 276 - 283
  • [39] RIOT NEWS - PRESS, SPREAD OF OPINION, AND DEMOGEOGRAPHIC SELF-INTEREST
    ROSENTHAL, MM
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1978, 5 (02) : 176 - 201
  • [40] Socialisation or Self-interest? Explaining Public Attitudes towards Government Support for Rural Areas
    Sorensen, Jens Fyhn Lykke
    Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase
    JOURNAL OF RURAL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 11 (01): : 30 - 42