Study of sign segmentation in the text of Chinese sign language

被引:0
|
作者
Dengfeng Yao
Minghu Jiang
Yunlong Huang
Abudoukelimu Abulizi
Hanjing Li
机构
[1] Beijing Union University,Beijing Key Lab of Information Service Engineering
[2] Tsinghua University,Lab of Computational Linguistics, School of Humanities
关键词
Chinese sign language (CSL); Phonology; Backward maximum matching (BMM); Conditional random fields (CRFs);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The natural language processing (NLP) of sign language aims to make human sign language “understandable” to computers. In achieving this goal, the text of sign language should first be segmented into sign sequences for computers to recognize. This segmentation process constitutes the basis for the information processing of sign language. With an aim to solve the problems in expressing Chinese sign language (CSL), this paper analyzes the lexical features of CSL and discusses various sign segmentation algorithms used in obtaining computer-read files. Sign segmentation involves two main approaches: The first is rule based, whereas the second is statistics based. Backward maximum matching (BMM) is an important rule-based method widely used in Chinese NLP fields. The recently proposed conditional random fields (CRFs) have also demonstrated excellent performance as a statistical method in international tests. In this study, both the BMM and CRFs methods are employed on the same dataset to explore the practical issues in the sign segmentation of CSL. The results of the CRFs method are then presented and discussed. Our corpus contains only hundreds of sentences; therefore, cross-validation based on CRFs is also performed to avoid the unreliable function that may arise from using an exceedingly small corpus scale within limited processing time. Specifically, three-group twofold cross-validation is applied to analyze the design of the annotation specification and the selection of a feature template. The results validate the effectiveness of our proposed segmentation strategy and confirm that CRFs outperform the BMM method. The proposed approach yields an F-score of 77.4% in sign segmentation in the CSL corpus. The CRFs perform effectively in sign segmentation because they can capture the arbitrary, overlapping features of the input in a Markov model. However, to obtain more satisfactory results, we must rely on the technological development of the sign language corpus.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:725 / 737
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On Translation of Sign Language from Chinese into English Based on the Theory of Relevance-Study on the Translation of Sign Language of Hainan Scenic Spots
    Li Yufeng
    Jing Zhihua
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND GLOBAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (ISSGBM 20120), VOL 8, 2012, 8 : 345 - 349
  • [42] CSLML: a markup language for expressive Chinese sign language synthesis
    Ye, Kejia
    Yin, Baocai
    Wang, Lichun
    COMPUTER ANIMATION AND VIRTUAL WORLDS, 2009, 20 (2-3) : 237 - 245
  • [43] Real time image enhancement and segmentation for sign/text detection
    Haritaoglu, ED
    Haritaoglu, I
    2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 993 - 996
  • [44] Sign language comprehension:: The case of Spanish sign language
    Rodriguez-Ortiz, I. R.
    JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2008, 13 (03): : 378 - 390
  • [45] Mouth actions in sign languages: An empirical study of Irish Sign Language
    Bank, Richard
    LANGUAGE, 2015, 91 (03) : 743 - 746
  • [46] Rosetta-LSF: an Aligned Corpus of French Sign Language and French for Text-to-Sign Translation
    Bertin-Lemee, Elise
    Braffort, Annelies
    Challant, Camille
    Danet, Claire
    Dauriac, Boris
    Filhol, Michael
    Martinod, Emmanuella
    Segouat, Jeremie
    LREC 2022: THIRTEEN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2022, : 4955 - 4962
  • [47] SIGN LANGUAGE
    BINDER, J
    OMNI, 1990, 12 (06) : 14 - 14
  • [48] 'Sign Language'
    Gasparini, L
    ANTIGONISH REVIEW, 2002, (130): : 105 - 106
  • [49] Neural correlates of fingerspelling, text, and sign processing in deaf American Sign Language-English bilinguals
    Emmorey, Karen
    McCullough, Stephen
    Weisberg, Jill
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 30 (06) : 749 - 767
  • [50] Sign language
    Bilchik, GS
    HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS, 1996, 70 (06): : 69 - &