China’s Complex Leadership in G20 and Global Governance: From Hangzhou 2016 to Kunming 2021

被引:0
|
作者
John Kirton
Alissa Xinhe Wang
机构
[1] University of Toronto,Department of Political Science
来源
关键词
G20; China; United States; Leadership; Compliance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
How and why have China’s G20 and thus global leadership changed since China hosted its first G20 summit at Hangzhou in September 2016? Since then the G20 has shaped global governance on an expanding array of subjects beyond its finance-economic core. China has consistently surpassed the other major powers in its economic growth, but also in its vulnerabilities at home. Its institutional leadership in long-established multilateral organizations has grown. The most systematic detailed account of China’s leadership in G20 governance from 1999 to 2015 argued that China was always a leader in G20 governance but never led alone, always doing so with another, different G20 member, as the subject changed. New findings arise by using an expanded model of China’s leadership, matching Xi Jinping’s priorities at G20 summits with the summit’s collective conclusions, commitments, compliance, and institutional development of global governance and examining the critical cases of climate change, biodiversity, infrastructure, and digitalization. This shows that China’s G20 leadership has become more complex and cautious since 2016, even as G20 performance has generally grown. In 2022 as China institutionally leads global governance on biodiversity and thus climate change, by hosting the United Nations biodiversity summit in Kunming in April and May, it can create cooperative leadership in the G20 from all the world’s great biodiversity powers of Russia and Brazil from the BRICS, Canada and the US from the G7, and Indonesia as G20 host.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 380
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE INFLUENCE OF THE G20'S DIGITALIZATION LEADERSHIP ON DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND GOVERNANCE OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
    Shelepov, A.
    VESTNIK MEZHDUNARODNYKH ORGANIZATSII-INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [32] Characterization of ozone in the lower troposphere during the 2016 G20 conference in Hangzhou
    Wenjing Su
    Cheng Liu
    Qihou Hu
    Guangqiang Fan
    Zhouqing Xie
    Xin Huang
    Tianshu Zhang
    Zhenyi Chen
    Yunsheng Dong
    Xiangguang Ji
    Haoran Liu
    Zhuang Wang
    Jianguo Liu
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [33] Brazil's Role in Institutions of Global Economic Governance: The WTO and G20
    Doctor, Mahrukh
    GLOBAL SOCIETY, 2015, 29 (03) : 286 - 300
  • [34] Characterization of ozone in the lower troposphere during the 2016 G20 conference in Hangzhou
    Su, Wenjing
    Liu, Cheng
    Hu, Qihou
    Fan, Guangqiang
    Xie, Zhouqing
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Tianshu
    Chen, Zhenyi
    Dong, Yunsheng
    Ji, Xiangguang
    Liu, Haoran
    Wang, Zhuang
    Liu, Jianguo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [35] Globalization's Implications for G20 Governance
    Kirton, J.
    VESTNIK MEZHDUNARODNYKH ORGANIZATSII-INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 15 (02): : 24 - 54
  • [36] Global Governance and Global Summits from the G8 to the G20: History, Opportunities and Challenges
    Prodi, Amano
    CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2016, 24 (04) : 5 - 14
  • [37] One in 20: the G20, middle powers and global governance reform
    Downie, Christian
    THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2017, 38 (07) : 1493 - 1510
  • [38] THE G20 AND GLOBAL ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE: LESSONS FROM MULTI-LEVEL EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE?
    Wouters, Jan
    Ramopoulos, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2012, 15 (03) : 751 - 775
  • [39] Global Economic Governance and the British Economy: From the Gold Standard to the G20
    Rogers, Chris
    GLOBAL SOCIETY, 2015, 29 (03) : 301 - 320