A multidimensional Lorenz dominance relation: some corrections

被引：0
|
作者：
Asis Kumar Banerjee
机构：
[1] Institute of Development Studies Kolkata,
来源：
Social Choice and Welfare | 2014年 / 43卷
关键词：
Economic Theory; Weight Vector; Additional Condition; Binary Relation; Dominance Relation;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：981 / 982
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RELATIVE OR ABSOLUTE DOMINANCE IN THE SENSE OF LORENZ AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
    MOYES, P
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 1992, 43 (05): : 895 - 916
  • [32] Reentrant lines scheduling and Lorenz dominance: a comparative study
    Dugardin, F.
    Yalaoui, F.
    Amodeo, L.
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN DECISION AND CONTROL, 2008, 1 : 707 - 712
  • [33] On evaluating social welfare by sequential generalized Lorenz dominance
    Ok, EA
    Lambert, PJ
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1999, 63 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [34] Ultraviolet dominance of power corrections in QCD?
    Braun, VM
    BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL V. FIFTH CONFERENCE, 1997, (415): : 341 - 346
  • [35] Lorenz dominance for transformed income distributions: A simple proof
    Damjanovic, T
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 50 (02) : 234 - 237
  • [36] Ocular dominance measurements and monovision corrections
    Barcala, Xoana
    Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor
    Zaytouny, Amal
    Dorronsoro, Carlos
    Peli, Eli
    Marcos, Susana
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [37] Multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximities with a dominance
    Okada, Akinori
    Imaizumi, Tadashi
    ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS, 2007, : 307 - +
  • [38] DOMINANCE IN RELATION TO ACHIEVEMENT
    SHAFER, SA
    LILLY, EC
    ACADEMIC THERAPY, 1970, 6 (02): : 177 - 185
  • [39] SEEKING SUBJECTIVE DOMINANCE IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL SPACE - AN EXPLANATION OF THE ASYMMETRIC DOMINANCE EFFECT
    ARIELY, D
    WALLSTEN, TS
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 63 (03) : 223 - 232
  • [40] Restricted Lorenz dominance of economic inequality in one and many dimensions
    Karl Mosler
    The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2004, 2 (2) : 89 - 103
12345