Effect of pH and penetration enhancers on electroosmotic flow and flux through skin

We have investigated the effect of pH and four penetration enhancers on the electroosmotic volume flow (EVF) and flux through skin to get more detailed understanding of this phenomenon and its effect on flux. The results were evaluated in relation EVF and the permeability change by current induced skin damage. At pH 7.4, we have confirmed that the direction of convective solvent flow is from anode to cathode. At pH 4.0, no permselectivity was observed and it seems that this pH is close to the isoelectric point of skin. At pH 3.0, the permselectivity of skin is reversed. From the difference in flux between just before (47 μg/cm2 h) and after (32 μg/cm2 h) cathodal current-off, the magnitude of EVF is estimated to be smaller than 1.5 μl/cm2 h, if we consider the recovery of skin to a lower permeability after current-off. At pH 7.4, Oleic acid (OA) and propylene glycol monolaurate (PGML) increased the passive flux markedly. Synergistic effect in flux between OA and current was observed for both anodal and cathodal current. The use of isopropyl myristate (IPM) in combination with anodal current resulted in reduced flux when compared to the flux of anodal current alone. Cathodal flux of OA or PGML treated skin increased continuously until the current was off. However, to the contrary of our expectation, flux decreased after current-off. We think this is mainly due to the recovery of damaged skin (flux decreasing effect), though the disappearance of EVF may slightly increase the flux. For IPM and propylene glycol, the combination of enhancer with cathodal current inhibited the flux, similar to that observed for anodal delivery. Overall, these results provide further information on the role of electroosmosis and the effect of penetration enhancers in combination with current on flux through skin. © 2012 The Korean Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology.