Comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP) approaches for predicting TBM penetration rate

被引:0
|
作者
Alireza Afradi
Arash Ebrahimabadi
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Mining and Geology, Qaemshahr Branch
来源
SN Applied Sciences | 2020年 / 2卷
关键词
Tunnel boring machine (TBM); Chamshir water conveyance tunnel; Artificial neural networks (ANN); Support vector machine (SVM); Gene expression programming (GEP);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The history of tunnel boring machine (TBM) tunnelling dates back to nearly 50 years ago. Due to high construction cost, the investigation on TBM performance is regarded as one of the crucial issues which should be considered from different aspects. The prediction of TBM penetration rate is one of the most important part of every mechanized tunnelling project which plays a key role in selecting the machine as well. One of the major difficulties and challenges in TBM performance prediction is to apply novel approaches to predict the TBMs penetration rate. Considering the importance of this issue, the objective of this research work is to attain more realistic models for predicting TBM penetration rate in Iranian water conveyance tunneling. With this respect, a database comprises field data and machine parameters in Chamshir water conveyance tunneling project were established. The data were then analyzed through artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP). Results demonstrated that obtained values of the coefficient of determination (R2) and the root mean square error (RMSE) found to be 0.99 and 0.15 for ANN, 0.95 and 0.37 for SVM, 0.99 and 0.11 for GEP, respectively. These models can be applied to predict TBM penetration rate in the Chamshir water conveyance tunnel. Moreover, it can be concluded that the GEP method has the higher accuracy (maximum R2 and minimum RMSE) among all predictive models.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP) approaches for predicting TBM penetration rate
    Afradi, Alireza
    Ebrahimabadi, Arash
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 2 (12):
  • [2] A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network(ANN) and Support Vector Machine(SVM) Classifiers for Neural Seizure Detection
    Elgammal, Mohamed A.
    Mostafa, Hassan
    Salama, Khaled N.
    Mohieldin, Ahmed Nader
    2019 IEEE 62ND INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (MWSCAS), 2019, : 646 - 649
  • [3] Numerical assessment of rectangular tunnels configurations using support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP)
    Zhang, Jun
    Shi, Ruoli
    Shi, Shaohua
    Alzo'ubi, A. K.
    Roco-Videla, Angel
    Hussein, Mohamed M. A.
    Khan, Afrasyab
    ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2022, 38 (SUPPL 4) : 3581 - 3597
  • [4] Numerical assessment of rectangular tunnels configurations using support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP)
    Jun Zhang
    Ruoli Shi
    Shaohua Shi
    A. K. Alzo’ubi
    Angel Roco-Videla
    Mohamed. M. A. Hussein
    Afrasyab Khan
    Engineering with Computers, 2022, 38 : 3581 - 3597
  • [5] Comparative analysis of using artificial neural networks (ANN) and gene expression programming (GEP) in backcalculation of pavement layer thickness
    Saltan, M
    Terzi, S
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SCIENCES, 2005, 12 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [6] Estimation of River Bedform Dimension Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)
    Javadi, F.
    Ahmadi, M. M.
    Qaderi, K.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 17 (04): : 859 - 868
  • [7] Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction
    Najwa Mohd Rizal, Nur
    Hayder, Gasim
    Mnzool, Mohammed
    Elnaim, Bushra M. E.
    Mohammed, Adil Omer Yousif
    Khayyat, Manal M.
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [8] Predicting hourly cooling load in the building: A comparison of support vector machine and different artificial neural networks
    Li, Qiong
    Meng, Qinglin
    Cai, Jiejin
    Yoshino, Hiroshi
    Mochida, Akashi
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [9] Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN)
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Naghibi, Seyed Amir
    Motevalli, Alireza
    Mansor, Shattri
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2018, 9 (01) : 49 - 69
  • [10] Compressive Strength Prediction via Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for Concrete Containing RCA
    Ahmad, Ayaz
    Chaiyasarn, Krisada
    Farooq, Furqan
    Ahmad, Waqas
    Suparp, Suniti
    Aslam, Fahid
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (08)