Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction

被引:18
|
作者
Najwa Mohd Rizal, Nur [1 ]
Hayder, Gasim [2 ]
Mnzool, Mohammed [3 ]
Elnaim, Bushra M. E. [4 ]
Mohammed, Adil Omer Yousif [5 ]
Khayyat, Manal M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tenaga Nas, Coll Grad Studies, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
[2] Univ Tenaga Nas, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
[3] Taif Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, POB 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
[4] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Sci & Humanities Al Sulail, Dept Comp Sci, Al Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia
[5] Qassim Univ, Coll Sci & Arts, Dept Comp Sci, POB 1162, Al Bukairiyah 51941, Saudi Arabia
[6] Umm Al Qura Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Syst, Dept Informat Syst, POB 7607, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia
关键词
river; water quality parameters; regression models; ANN; SVM;
D O I
10.3390/pr10081652
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Both anthropogenic and natural sources of pollution are regionally significant. Therefore, in order to monitor and protect the quality of Langat River from deterioration, we use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to model the river water quality. This study has applied several machine learning models (two support vector machines (SVMs), six regression models, and artificial neural network (ANN)) to predict total suspended solids (TSS), total solids (TS), and dissolved solids (DS)) in Langat River, Malaysia. All of the models have been assessed using root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE) as well as the determination of coefficient (R-2). Based on the model performance metrics, the ANN model outperformed all models, while the GPR and SVM models exhibited the characteristic of over-fitting. The remaining machine learning models exhibited fair to poor performances. Although there are a few researches conducted to predict TDS using ANN, however, there are less to no research conducted to predict TS and TSS in Langat River. Therefore, this is the first study to evaluate the water quality (TSS, TS, and DS) of Langat River using the aforementioned models (especially SVM and the six regression models).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network(ANN) and Support Vector Machine(SVM) Classifiers for Neural Seizure Detection
    Elgammal, Mohamed A.
    Mostafa, Hassan
    Salama, Khaled N.
    Mohieldin, Ahmed Nader
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 62ND INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (MWSCAS), 2019, : 646 - 649
  • [2] Estimation of River Bedform Dimension Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)
    Javadi, F.
    Ahmadi, M. M.
    Qaderi, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 17 (04): : 859 - 868
  • [3] The prediction of blue water footprint at Semambu water treatment plant by means of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models
    Moni, Syazwan
    Aziz, Edriyana
    Majeed, Anwar P. P. Abdul
    Malek, Marlinda
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2021, 123
  • [4] Comparison Between Wind Power Prediction Models Based on Wavelet Decomposition with Least-Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)
    De Giorgi, Maria Grazia
    Campilongo, Stefano
    Ficarella, Antonio
    Congedo, Paolo Maria
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (08) : 5251 - 5272
  • [5] Software Defect Prediction: A Comparison Between Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine
    Arora, Ishani
    Saha, Anju
    [J]. ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 562 : 51 - 61
  • [6] Comparison of Artificial Neural Network, Linear Regression and Support Vector Machine for Prediction of Solar PV Power
    Kuriakose, Ans Maria
    Kariyalil, Denny Philip
    Augusthy, Marymol
    Sarath, S.
    Jacob, Joffie
    Antony, Neenu Rose
    [J]. 2020 IEEE PUNE SECTION INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (PUNECON), 2020, : 53 - 58
  • [7] Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Bayesian Network for prediction and analysis of GCC traffic accidents
    AlKheder S.
    AlRukaibi F.
    Aiash A.
    [J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2023, 14 (06) : 7331 - 7339
  • [8] A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction
    Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali
    Zadeh, Hojat Ahmad
    Isazadeh, Mohammad
    Terzi, Ozlem
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (06)
  • [9] A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction
    Mohammad Ali Ghorbani
    Hojat Ahmad Zadeh
    Mohammad Isazadeh
    Ozlem Terzi
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [10] A comparison between performance of support vector regression and artificial neural network in prediction of pipe burst rate in water distribution networks
    Shirzad, Akbar
    Tabesh, Massoud
    Farmani, Raziyeh
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 18 (04) : 941 - 948