How does retirement affect optimal life cycle portfolio allocation between stocks and bonds?

被引:0
|
作者
Valentinas Rudys
机构
[1] Weber State University,Department of Economics
来源
关键词
Saving; Portfolio allocation; Investing; Consumption; Life cycle; Retirement; Stocks; Bonds; C63; D14; D15; G11; G51;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Portfolio allocation decisions over the life cycle depend, among many factors, on the retirement income as well as risks and choices faced in retirement. However, due to computational complexity, many retirement factors are typically assumed away. By building on the standard life cycle investment-consumption model that includes a more realistic progressive retirement income program, I discuss how each aspect of retirement income affects optimal portfolio allocation over the life cycle. I find that all investors across all scenarios maintain high levels of stocks in their portfolios at a young age. However, investors who face low net replacement rates, risk of forced retirement, or retirement income uncertainty hedge these risks by accumulating higher private savings and reducing risky portfolio shares at an earlier age. In a realistic setting with early forced retirement risk and endogenous retirement timing, optimal equity portfolio share temporarily increases once the investor becomes eligible for retirement. Retirement income’s dependency on workers’ lifetime labor earnings is not, however, an important factor in portfolio allocation over the life cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 224
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms
    Auerbach, Alan J.
    Charles, Kerwin K.
    Coile, Courtney C.
    Gale, William
    Goldman, Dana
    Lee, Ronald
    Lucas, Charles M.
    Orszag, Peter R.
    Sheiner, Louise M.
    Tysinger, Bryan
    Weil, David N.
    Wolfers, Justin
    Wong, Rebeca
    [J]. GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2017, 42 (03): : 475 - 499
  • [42] How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms
    Alan J. Auerbach
    Kerwin K. Charles
    Courtney C. Coile
    William Gale
    Dana Goldman
    Ronald Lee
    Charles M. Lucas
    Peter R. Orszag
    Louise M. Sheiner
    Bryan Tysinger
    David N. Weil
    Justin Wolfers
    Rebeca Wong
    [J]. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2017, 42 : 475 - 499
  • [43] How Does Water Availability Affect the Allocation to Bark in a Mediterranean Conifer?
    Martin-Sanz, Ruth C.
    San-Martin, Roberto
    Poorter, Hendrik
    Vazquez, Antonio
    Climent, Jose
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [44] How does state ownership affect optimal export taxes?
    Long, Ngo
    Staehler, Frank
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2008, 6
  • [45] Optimal retirement savings over the life cycle: A deterministic analysis in closed form
    Fischer, Marcel
    Jensen, Bjarne Astrup
    Koch, Marlene
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2023, 112 : 48 - 58
  • [46] How the Investor's Risk Preferences Influence the Optimal Allocation in a Credibilistic Portfolio Problem
    Irina GEORGESCU
    Jani KINNUNEN
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2019, (04) : 317 - 329
  • [47] Does quality of work life affect men and women's retirement planning differently?
    Larsen M.
    [J]. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2008, 3 (1) : 23 - 42
  • [49] Optimal asset allocation towards the end of the life cycle: To annuitize or not to annuitize?
    Milevsky, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 1998, 65 (03) : 401 - 426
  • [50] Optimal life-cycle asset allocation: Understanding the empirical evidence
    Gomes, F
    Michaelides, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2005, 60 (02): : 869 - 904