Scenario Evaluation for Subsea Production System

被引:0
|
作者
Tiago P. Estefen
Daniel S. Werneck
Diogo do Amaral
João Paulo C. Jorge
Leandro C. Trovoado
Jian Su
Edson Labanca
Segen F. Estefen
机构
[1] COPPE/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro,
[2] PETROBRAS,undefined
关键词
Subsea production system; subsea to beach; flow assurance;
D O I
10.1007/BF03449234
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Scenarios for a subsea production system are evaluated considering technical feasibility, operational reliability and financial return for the investment. A case study based on an offshore gas field is adopted as well as three associated subsea production scenarios in order to perform the relevant analyses which could lead to the recommendation of the best option. The field is located at a distance of 160 km from the Brazilian coast at the water depth of 500 m, decreasing to 180 m at 140 km from the coast and then progressively up to the beach. Three different scenarios for the subsea production systems are proposed. Semi-submersible (scenario 1) distant 160 km from the coast at water depth of 500 m and the subsea arrangement constituted of eight satellite wells. Jacket platform (scenario 2) distant 140 km from the coast at water depth of 180 m. Scenario 3 is a Subsea to Beach system (without platform). Initially, general arrangements for the subsea production systems are implemented to establish the respective equipment locations. Flow assurance has been considered in order to avoid hydrate formation which could block the lines and stop production. Risk assessment for the proposed subsea production systems are performed using fault tree analyses. The selected top event is either total or partial production loss. Finally a cost analysis is performed for the system life cycle, including both capital (CAPEX) and operational (OPEX) expenditures. Based on these assessment analyses the best arrangement for the subsea production system is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 87
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] UPDATE OF THE ENCHOVA FIELD 10-WELL SUBSEA PRODUCTION SYSTEM
    REIMERT, LE
    GRAY, DJ
    MACHADO, ZL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 33 (07): : 1289 - 1296
  • [42] A Critical Analysis of Open Protocol for Subsea Production Controls System Communication
    Iyalla, Ibiye
    Arulliah, Elankumaran
    Innes, David
    [J]. OCEANS 2017 - ABERDEEN, 2017,
  • [43] A methodology for subsea system design considering integrated production/injection modeling
    Wang, Yuxi
    Estefen, Segen F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 45 (10)
  • [44] Subsea production system manifold and control allocation unit integration design
    Offshore Oil Engineering Co. Ltd., Tianjin
    300451, China
    [J]. Ship Build. China, (243-248):
  • [45] EXPERIMENTAL SUBSEA PRODUCTION STATION
    CHATEAU, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1978, 30 (NOV): : 1641 - 1648
  • [46] SUBSEA PRODUCTION SYSTEMS OUTLOOK
    不详
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1979, 77 (38) : 97 - &
  • [47] Increasing subsea production with DRA
    Gillespie, John
    Schroeder, Art
    Kinnell, Graeme
    [J]. World Oil, 2021, 242 (12) : 45 - 49
  • [48] An assessment of subsea production systems
    Devegowda, D
    Scott, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 56 (08): : 56 - 57
  • [49] Application of Petri nets to performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventer system
    Liu, Zengkai
    Liu, Yonghong
    Cai, Baoping
    Li, Xiaolei
    Tian, Xiaojie
    [J]. ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2015, 54 : 240 - 249
  • [50] Risk-Based Maintenance Optimization for a Subsea Production System with Epistemic Uncertainty
    Liu, Ying
    Ma, Liuying
    Sun, Luyang
    Zhang, Xiao
    Yang, Yunyun
    Zhao, Qing
    Qu, Zhigang
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (08):