Systematic review of blood diagnostic markers in colorectal cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Stella Nikolaou
Shengyang Qiu
Francesca Fiorentino
Shahnawaz Rasheed
Paris Tekkis
Christos Kontovounisios
机构
[1] Chelsea and Westminster Hospital,Department of Colorectal Surgery
[2] Royal Marsden Hospital,Department of Colorectal Surgery
[3] Imperial College,Department of Surgery and Cancer
[4] Royal Marsden Hospital,undefined
来源
关键词
Biomarkers; Diagnosis; Bowel cancer; Tissue; Serum; Review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic ability of blood markers for colorectal cancer (CRC). A systematic review of the literature for diagnostic blood markers for primary human colorectal cancer over the last 5 years was performed. The primary outcome was to assess the diagnostic ability of these markers in diagnosing colorectal cancer. The secondary outcome was to see whether the marker was compared to other markers. The tertiary outcome was to assess diagnostic ability in early versus late CRC, including stage IV disease. We identified 51 studies (29 prospective, 14 retrospective, and 8 meta-analyses). The markers were divided in broadly four groups: nucleic acids (RNA/DNA/messenger RNA/microRNAs), cytokines, antibodies, and proteins. The most promising circulating markers identified among the nucleid acids were NEAT_v2 non-coding RNA, SDC2 methylated DNA, and SEPT9 methylated DNA. The most promising cytokine to detect CRC was interleukin 8, and the most promising circulating proteins were CA11-19 glycoprotein and DC-SIGN/DC-SIGNR. Sensitivities of these markers for detecting primary colorectal carcinoma ranged from 70 to 98% and specificities from 84 to 98.7%. The best studied blood marker was SEPT9 methylated DNA, which showed great variability with sensitivities ranging from 48.2 to 95.6% and specificities from 80 to 98.9%, making its clinical applicability challenging. If combined with fecal immunochemical test (FIT), the sensitivity improved from 78 to 94% in detecting CRC. Methylated SEPT9, methylated SDC2, and -SIGN/DC-SIGNR protein had better sensitivity and specificity than CEA or CA 19-9. With the exception of SEPT9 which is currently being implemented as a screening test for CRC all other markers lacked reproducibility and standardization and were studied in relatively small population samples.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 498
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic and Prognostic Serum Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer
    Liu, Zhongyu
    Zhang, Yingchong
    Niu, Yulong
    Li, Ke
    Liu, Xin
    Chen, Huijuan
    Gao, Chunfang
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [32] Systematic review: Glycomics as diagnostic markers for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Butaye, Emma
    Somers, Nicky
    Grossar, Lorenz
    Pauwels, Nele
    Lefere, Sander
    Devisscher, Lindsey
    Raevens, Sarah
    Geerts, Anja
    Meuris, Leander
    Callewaert, Nico
    Van Vlierberghe, Hans
    Verhelst, Xavier
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 59 (01) : 23 - 38
  • [33] Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Niemeijer, Maartje N.
    Grooten, Iris J.
    Vos, Nikki
    Bais, Joke M. J.
    van der Post, Joris A.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Roseboom, Tessa J.
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    Painter, Rebecca C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (02) : 150.e1 - 150.e15
  • [34] Nomograms for colorectal cancer:A systematic review
    Kazushige Kawai
    Eiji Sunami
    Hironori Yamaguchi
    Soichiro Ishihara
    Shinsuke Kazama
    Hiroaki Nozawa
    Keisuke Hata
    Tomomichi Kiyomatsu
    Junichiro Tanaka
    Toshiaki Tanaka
    Takeshi Nishikawa
    Joji Kitayama
    Toshiaki Watanabe
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (41) : 11877 - 11886
  • [35] Dermatomyositis and colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Ioannis D. Gkegkes
    Evelyn E. Minis
    Christos Iavazzo
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2018, 187 : 615 - 620
  • [36] Dermatomyositis and colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Gkegkes, Ioannis D.
    Minis, Evelyn E.
    Iavazzo, Christos
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 (03) : 615 - 620
  • [37] Metformin and Colorectal Cancer - A Systematic Review
    Kobiela, Jarek
    Dobrzycka, Malgorzata
    Jedrusik, Piotr
    Kobiela, Paulina
    Spychalski, Piotr
    Sledzinski, Zbigniew
    Zdrojewski, Tomasz
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2019, 127 (07) : 445 - 454
  • [38] Nomograms for colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Sunami, Eiji
    Yamaguchi, Hironori
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    Kazama, Shinsuke
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Hata, Keisuke
    Kiyomatsu, Tomomichi
    Tanaka, Junichiro
    Tanaka, Toshiaki
    Nishikawa, Takeshi
    Kitayama, Joji
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (41) : 11877 - 11886
  • [39] Statins and Colorectal Cancer - A Systematic Review
    Dobrzycka, Malgorzata
    Spychalski, Piotr
    Lachinski, Andrzej J.
    Kobiela, Paulina
    Jedrusik, Piotr
    Kobiela, Jarek
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2020, 128 (04) : 255 - 262
  • [40] Pharmacogenetics in colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Funke, Silvia
    Brenner, Hermann
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2008, 9 (08) : 1079 - 1099