Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Natalie A. Jones
Pascal Perez
Thomas G. Measham
Gail J. Kelly
Patrick d’Aquino
Katherine A. Daniell
Anne Dray
Nils Ferrand
机构
[1] University of Queensland,School of Integrative Systems
[2] RMAP/RSPAS,undefined
[3] Australian National University,undefined
[4] CIRAD-UPR-GREEN,undefined
[5] Resource Futures Program,undefined
[6] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems,undefined
[7] Bureau of Rural Sciences,undefined
[8] CEMAGREF-UMR-GEAU,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2009年 / 44卷
关键词
Participation; Modeling; Evaluation; Complex systems science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Participatory modeling is increasingly recognized as an effective way to assist collective decision-making processes in the domain of natural resource management. This article introduces a framework for evaluating projects that have adopted a participatory modeling approach. This evaluation framework—known as the “Protocol of Canberra”—was developed through a collaboration between French and Australian researchers engaged in participatory modeling and evaluation research. The framework seeks to assess the extent to which different participatory modeling initiatives not only modify perceptions among and interactions between participants, but also contribute to collective decision-making. The article discusses the development of the framework and it’s application to three case-studies, two from Australia and one from the Pacific Island of the Republic of Kiribati. The article concludes with some comments for future use of the framework in a range of participatory modeling contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1195
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards a participatory GIS: Evaluating case studies of participatory rural appraisal and GIS in the developing world
    University of Colorado at Boulder, Department of Geography, Campus Box 260, Boulder, CO 80309, United States
    Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2002, 29 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [32] Cross-Case Data Objects in Business Processes: Semantics and Analysis
    Haarmann, Stephan
    Weske, Mathias
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT FORUM, BPM FORUM 2020, 2020, 392 : 3 - 17
  • [33] Logistic management of trailers based on the EPCIS standard: A cross-case analysis
    Ringsberg, Henrik
    Lumsden, Kent Kenth
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 19 : 65 - 72
  • [34] Adoption of Mobile Technology in the Supply Chain: An Exploratory Cross-Case Analysis
    Doolin, Bill
    Ali, Eman Al Haj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2008, 4 (04) : 1 - 15
  • [35] Adoption of Tobacco 21: A Cross-Case Analysis of Ten US States
    Hudson, Shawna, V
    Kurti, Marin
    Howard, Jenna
    Sanabria, Bianca
    Schroth, Kevin R. J.
    Hrywna, Mary
    Delnevo, Cristine D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (11)
  • [36] Housing the urban poor through strategic networks: A cross-case analysis
    Cheah, Chee Wei
    Lee, Christina K. C.
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 124
  • [37] Financing networks of care: a cross-case analysis from six countries
    Dintrans, Pablo Villalobos
    Roder-DeWan, Sanam
    Wang, Huihui
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [38] Usability testing of a conceptual model through retrospective cross-case analysis
    Mynott, John Paul
    Kager, Klara
    METHODSX, 2024, 13
  • [39] Improving a framework for evaluating participatory science
    Calyx, Cobi
    Finlay, Summer May
    EVALUATION, 2022, 28 (02) : 150 - 165
  • [40] Cross-case analysis of producer-driven marketing channels in Australia
    Broderick, Sherryl
    Wright, Vic
    Kristiansen, Paul
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2011, 113 (10-11): : 1217 - 1228