Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Natalie A. Jones
Pascal Perez
Thomas G. Measham
Gail J. Kelly
Patrick d’Aquino
Katherine A. Daniell
Anne Dray
Nils Ferrand
机构
[1] University of Queensland,School of Integrative Systems
[2] RMAP/RSPAS,undefined
[3] Australian National University,undefined
[4] CIRAD-UPR-GREEN,undefined
[5] Resource Futures Program,undefined
[6] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems,undefined
[7] Bureau of Rural Sciences,undefined
[8] CEMAGREF-UMR-GEAU,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2009年 / 44卷
关键词
Participation; Modeling; Evaluation; Complex systems science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Participatory modeling is increasingly recognized as an effective way to assist collective decision-making processes in the domain of natural resource management. This article introduces a framework for evaluating projects that have adopted a participatory modeling approach. This evaluation framework—known as the “Protocol of Canberra”—was developed through a collaboration between French and Australian researchers engaged in participatory modeling and evaluation research. The framework seeks to assess the extent to which different participatory modeling initiatives not only modify perceptions among and interactions between participants, but also contribute to collective decision-making. The article discusses the development of the framework and it’s application to three case-studies, two from Australia and one from the Pacific Island of the Republic of Kiribati. The article concludes with some comments for future use of the framework in a range of participatory modeling contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1195
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis
    Jones, Natalie A.
    Perez, Pascal
    Measham, Thomas G.
    Kelly, Gail J.
    d'Aquino, Patrick
    Daniell, Katherine A.
    Dray, Anne
    Ferrand, Nils
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 44 (06) : 1180 - 1195
  • [2] Evaluating Informational Inputs in Rulemaking Processes: A Cross-Case Analysis
    Crow, Deserai A.
    Albright, Elizabeth A.
    Koebele, Elizabeth
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2017, 49 (09) : 1318 - 1345
  • [3] The process of developing and implementing criteria for sustainable agriculture: A cross-case analysis
    Binnekamp, Menno
    Ingenbleek, Paul
    Goddijn, Silvia
    ETHICS AND THE POLITICS OF FOOD, 2006, : 239 - +
  • [4] Developing a systems transformation action research approach: a qualitative cross-case analysis
    Kaloga, Marissa E. P.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE, 2023, 31 (3-4) : 450 - 465
  • [5] Evaluating the Critical Success Factors of Marketing Automation Through Cross-Case Analysis and DEMATEL
    Mathur, Akshay
    Singh, Saumya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2024,
  • [6] Developing dynamic capabilities in electronic marketplaces: A cross-case study
    Koch, Hope
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 19 (01): : 28 - 38
  • [7] Doing Cross-Case Analysis: Online and Off
    Khan, Samia
    Mirzaee, Vanesa
    VanWynsberghe, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2010, 9 (04): : 448 - 448
  • [8] DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE INSTITUTIONS - LESSONS FROM CROSS-CASE ANALYSIS OF 24 AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION PROGRAMS
    GUSTAFSON, DJ
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 14 (02) : 121 - 134
  • [9] Building STEM in Schools: An Australian Cross-case Analysis
    Falloon, Garry
    Stevenson, Michael
    Beswick, Kim
    Fraser, Sharon
    Geiger, Vincent
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2021, 24 (04): : 110 - 122
  • [10] Urban freight terminals: A sustainability cross-case analysis
    Nathnail, Eftihia
    Gogas, Michael
    Adamos, Giannis
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE GREEN CITIES - GREEN LOGISTICS FOR GREENER CITIES, 2016, 16 : 394 - 402