Evaluation of focal pancreatic masses: comparison of mangafodipir-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical CT

被引:0
|
作者
Wolfgang Schima
Reinhold Függer
机构
[1] Department of Radiology,
[2] University of Vienna,undefined
[3] Währinger Gürtel 18–20,undefined
[4] 1090 Vienna,undefined
[5] Austria,undefined
[6] Department of Surgery,undefined
[7] University of Vienna,undefined
[8] Währinger Gürtel 18–20,undefined
[9] 1090 Vienna,undefined
[10] Austria,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2002年 / 12卷
关键词
Pancreas MR imaging Carcinoma Contrast medium Mangafodipir;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The detection and characterization of pancreatic tumors as well as the reliable staging of pancreatic cancer are important tasks for radiologic evaluation. Contrast-enhanced helical CT has been the standard modality for pancreatic imaging in many institutions, but MR imaging has gained a considerable role in the evaluation of patients with equivocal CT findings. Recently, the first organ-specific MR contrast agent targeted to the liver and pancreas, mangafodipir trisodium, has been registered in the European Union (EU) for use in MR imaging of the pancreas. This paper reviews technical considerations and characteristic imaging findings of mangafodipir-enhanced MR imaging in the assessment of focal pancreatic lesions. Contrast-enhanced MRI has proven to be very helpful in the detection of small tumors or the identification of tumor-simulating lesions in patients with equivocal CT findings. Mangafodopir may improve the staging of pancreatic cancer by increasing the sensitivity of MRI in the detection of liver metastases. This review summarizes the potential of contrast-enhanced MRI and the limitations compared with contrast-enhanced helical CT.
引用
收藏
页码:2998 / 3008
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Solid focal liver lesions indeterminate by contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging: the added diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Emilio Quaia
    Abdominal Imaging, 2012, 37 : 580 - 590
  • [12] Solid focal liver lesions indeterminate by contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging: the added diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Quaia, Emilio
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2012, 37 (04): : 580 - 590
  • [13] Characterization of focal hepatic masses by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Findings in 311 lesions
    Quillin, SP
    Atilla, S
    Brown, JJ
    Borrello, JA
    Yu, CY
    Pilgram, TK
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 15 (03) : 275 - 285
  • [14] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced helical CT in the diagnosis of high echo-level small focal liver lesions
    Liu, Jun-Jie
    Wang, Dan
    Li, Hong-Xue
    Zhou, Ting
    Zhao, Sheng-Fa
    Ding, Zhan-Ling
    Chen, Jie
    Bai, Tao
    Li, Le-Qun
    Li, Hang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (05): : 8176 - 8182
  • [15] Value of Contrast-Enhanced Microflow Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Masses in Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
    Luo, Runlan
    Wang, Qingyao
    Zhang, Yan
    Jiang, Wenli
    Wang, Yiru
    Luo, Yukun
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 2217 - 2227
  • [16] Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses: Discordance between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT and MRI
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Burns, Peter N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (01) : W7 - W12
  • [17] Contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging of renal vessels
    Tuna, Ibrahim S.
    Tatli, Servet
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2014, 39 (04): : 875 - 891
  • [18] Contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging of renal vessels
    Ibrahim S. Tuna
    Servet Tatli
    Abdominal Imaging, 2014, 39 : 875 - 891
  • [19] EVALUATION OF ADRENAL MASSES IN ONCOLOGIC PATIENTS - DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR VS CT
    KRESTIN, GP
    FRIEDMANN, G
    FISCHBACH, R
    NEUFANG, KFR
    ALLOLIO, B
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (01) : 104 - 110
  • [20] Contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Schima, W
    Mukerjee, A
    Saini, S
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 51 (04) : 235 - 244