Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Kazutaka Obama
Yoshiharu Sakai
机构
[1] Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Surgery
[2] Kyoto City Hospital,Department of Surgery
来源
Surgery Today | 2016年 / 46卷
关键词
Robotic gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; D2 lymphadenectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although over 3000 da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS) devices have been installed worldwide, robotic surgery for gastric cancer has not yet become widely spread and is only available in several advanced institutions. This is because, at least in part, the advantages of robotic surgery for gastric cancer remain unclear. The safety and feasibility of robotic gastrectomy have been demonstrated in several retrospective studies. However, no sound evidence has been reported to support the superiority of a robotic approach for gastric cancer treatment. In addition, the long-term clinical outcomes following robotic gastrectomy have yet to be clarified. Nevertheless, a robotic approach can potentially overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery if the advantageous functions of this technique are optimized, such as the use of wristed instruments, tremor filtering and high-resolution 3-D images. The potential advantages of robotic gastrectomy have been discussed in several retrospective studies, including the ability to achieve sufficient lymphadenectomy in the area of the splenic hilum, reductions in local complication rates and a shorter learning curve for the robotic approach compared to conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy. In this review, we present the current status and discuss issues regarding robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 534
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Obama, Kazutaka
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    SURGERY TODAY, 2016, 46 (05) : 528 - 534
  • [2] Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Yoo Min Kim
    Woo Jin Hyung
    Updates in Surgery, 2021, 73 : 853 - 863
  • [3] Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Kim, Yoo Min
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (03) : 853 - 863
  • [4] Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current evidence
    Alhossaini, Rana M.
    Altamran, Abdulaziz A.
    Seo, Won Jun
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2017, 1 (02): : 82 - 89
  • [5] Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A review of recent randomized controlled trials
    Jeong, Seong-A
    Lee, In-Seob
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION, 2022, 11 (02): : 50 - 55
  • [6] Status of minimally invasive gastrectomy Current advancements: robotic surgery and intraoperative imaging for gastric cancer
    Berlth, Felix
    Knospe, Luise
    Jansen-Winkeln, Boris
    Hadzijusufovic, Edin
    Tagkalos, Evangelos
    Niebisch, Stefan
    Moulla, Yusef
    Chalopin, Claire
    Koehler, Hannes
    Maktabi, Marianne
    Lang, Hauke
    Grimminger, Peter
    Gockel, Ines
    CHIRURG, 2021, 92 (06): : 528 - 534
  • [7] Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Son, Taeil
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (03) : 271 - 278
  • [8] Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy
    Ohira, Masaichi
    Toyokawa, Takahiro
    Sakurai, Katsunobu
    Kubo, Naoshi
    Tanaka, Hiroaki
    Muguruma, Kazuya
    Yashiro, Masakazu
    Onoda, Naoyoshi
    Hirakawa, Kosei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (08) : 2424 - 2433
  • [9] Current status of internal hernia after gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Sun, Ke-kang
    Wu, Yong-you
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [10] Current status of function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Kosuga, Toshiyuki
    Tsujiura, Masahiro
    Nakashima, Susumu
    Masuyama, Mamoru
    Otsuji, Eigo
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 5 (03): : 278 - 286