LES of turbulent surface shear stress and pressure-gradient-driven flow on shallow continental shelves

被引:0
|
作者
Guillaume Martinat
Ying Xu
Chester E. Grosch
Andrés E. Tejada-Martínez
机构
[1] Old Dominion University,Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Department of Ocean, Earth & Atmospheric Sciences
[2] University of South Florida,Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
[3] Michigan State University,National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory
来源
Ocean Dynamics | 2011年 / 61卷
关键词
Large eddy simulation; Langmuir circulation; Pressure-gradient-driven flow; Wind-driven flow; Free surface;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Turbulent shear flows on shallow continental shelves (here shallow means that the interaction with the solid, no-slip bottom is important) are of great importance because tide- and wind-driven flows on the shelf are drivers of the transfer of momentum, heat, and mass (gas) across the air–sea interface. These turbulent flows play an important role because vertical mixing and current are vectors for the transport of sediment and bioactive material on continental shelves. Understanding the dynamics of this class of flows presents complications because of the presence of a free surface and also because the flow can be driven by a pressure gradient (a tidal current), a stress at the free surface (a wind-driven current), or a combination of both. In addition, the flow can be modified by the presence of a wave field that can induce Langmuir circulation (Langmuir, Science 87:119–123, 1938). Large eddy simulation is used to quantify the effects of pressure gradient and wind shear on the distinctive structures of the turbulent flow. From these computations, an understanding of the physics governing the turbulence of pressure-driven and wind-driven flows, how they can interact in a normal or a tangential direction, and the effect of wave forcing on these flows is obtained.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Observations of Near-Bed Shear Stress in a Shallow, Wave- and Current-Driven Flow
    Egan, Galen
    Cowherd, Marianne
    Fringer, Oliver
    Monismith, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2019, 124 (08) : 6323 - 6344
  • [32] On the shear stress and thermal footprints of turbulent spots at zero pressure gradient (vol 27, pg 1001, 2013)
    Chong, Tze Pei
    Zhong, Shan
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 413 - 413
  • [33] Effect of Pressure Fluctuations and Flow Confinement on Shear Stress in Jet-Driven Scour Processes
    Pagliara, Simone
    Palermo, Michele
    WATER, 2020, 12 (03) : 1 - 13
  • [34] THE MEASUREMENT OF TURBULENT-BOUNDARY-LAYER SHEAR STRESS BY MEANS OF SURFACE IMPACT-PRESSURE PROBES
    FENTER, FW
    STALMACH, CJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 1958, 25 (12): : 793 - 794
  • [35] Reynolds and dispersive shear stress in free-surface turbulent channel flow over square bars
    Jalalabadi, Razieh
    Stoesser, Thorsten
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2022, 105 (03)
  • [36] Investigating the influence of surface shear stress on the stability of gravity-driven multilayer liquid flow
    Tomar, Dharmendra S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 102 (06): : 2317 - 2328
  • [37] THE TAYLOR PUMP - VISCOUS-FREE SURFACE FLOW DRIVEN BY ELECTRIC SHEAR-STRESS
    BASARAN, OA
    SCRIVEN, LE
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 1988, 67 : 259 - 273
  • [38] Experimental study on the flow instability of a binary mixture driven by rotation and surface-tension gradient in a shallow Czochralski configuration
    Yu, Jia-Jia
    Li, You-Rong
    Zhang, Lu
    Ye, Shuang
    Wu, Chun-Mei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 118 : 236 - 246
  • [39] Impact of transversal traveling surface waves in a non-zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer flow
    Meysonnat, Pascal S.
    Koh, Seong Ryong
    Roidl, Benedikt
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2016, 272 : 498 - 507
  • [40] Wall and interfacial shear stress in pressure driven two-phase laminar stratified pipe flow
    Biberg, D
    Halvorsen, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2000, 26 (10) : 1645 - 1673