The control of rank-abundance distributions by a competitive despotic species

被引:0
|
作者
Ralph Mac Nally
Clive A. McAlpine
Hugh P. Possingham
Martine Maron
机构
[1] The University of Canberra,Institute for Applied Ecology
[2] The University of Queensland,Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management
[3] The University of Queensland,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED)
[4] Imperial College London,Department of Life Sciences
来源
Oecologia | 2014年 / 176卷
关键词
Bayesian models; Colonial birds; Community structure; Hyperaggression; Strong interactors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accounting for differences in abundances among species remains a high priority for community ecology. While there has been more than 80 years of work on trying to explain the characteristic S shape of rank-abundance distributions (RADs), there has been recent conjecture that the form may not depend on ecological processes per se but may be a general phenomenon arising in many unrelated disciplines. We show that the RAD shape can be influenced by an ecological process, namely, interference competition. The noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala) is a hyperaggressive, ‘despotic’ bird that occurs over much of eastern Australia (>106 km2). We compiled data for bird communities from 350 locations within its range, which were collected using standard avian survey methods. We used hierarchical Bayesian models to show that the RAD shape was much altered when the abundance of the strong interactor exceeded a threshold density; RADs consistently were steeper when the density of the noisy miner ≥2.5 birds ha−1. The structure of bird communities at sites where the noisy miner exceeded this density was very different from that at sites where the densities fell below the threshold: species richness and Shannon diversity were much reduced, but mean abundances and mean avian biomass per site did not differ substantially.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 857
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Species abundance distributions over time
    Magurran, Anne E.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 10 (05) : 347 - 354
  • [32] Identifying hotspots for biodiversity management using rank abundance distributions
    Dunstan, Piers K.
    Bax, Nicholas J.
    Foster, Scott D.
    Williams, Alan
    Althaus, Franziska
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2012, 18 (01) : 22 - 32
  • [33] Taking species abundance distributions beyond individuals
    Morlon, Helene
    White, Ethan P.
    Etienne, Rampal S.
    Green, Jessica L.
    Ostling, Annette
    Alonso, David
    Enquist, Brian J.
    He, Fangliang
    Hurlbert, Allen
    Magurran, Anne E.
    Maurer, Brian A.
    McGill, Brian J.
    Olff, Han
    Storch, David
    Zillio, Tommaso
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (06) : 488 - 501
  • [34] How selection structures species abundance distributions
    Magurran, Anne E.
    Henderson, Peter A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 279 (1743) : 3722 - 3726
  • [35] Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions
    Magurran, AE
    Henderson, PA
    NATURE, 2003, 422 (6933) : 714 - 716
  • [36] Links between the species abundance distribution and the shape of the corresponding rank abundance curve
    Izsak, Janos
    Pavoine, Sandrine
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 14 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [37] Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions
    Anne E. Magurran
    Peter A. Henderson
    Nature, 2003, 422 : 714 - 716
  • [38] Species abundance distributions should underpin ordinal cover-abundance transformations
    McNellie, Megan J.
    Dorrough, Josh
    Oliver, Ian
    APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2019, 22 (03) : 361 - 372
  • [39] The effects of intraspecific density dependence on species richness and species abundance distributions
    Frederick R. Adler
    Theoretical Ecology, 2011, 4 : 153 - 162
  • [40] The effects of intraspecific density dependence on species richness and species abundance distributions
    Adler, Frederick R.
    THEORETICAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 4 (02) : 153 - 162