“Zyfas Medical v. Millennium Pharmaceuticals”Decision of the Supreme Court of Singapore 27 August 2020 – Case No. [2020] SGCA 84

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law | 2021年 / 52卷

关键词：

Process patents; Therapeutic product; Application for registration; Generic drug; Disclosure of existing patents in patent registration application; Application for registration with false, misleading or omitted information;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Process patents must be declared in an application for registration of a therapeutic product pursuant to reg 23(2) of the Health Products (Therapeutic Products) Regulations 2016 (S 329/2016).

引用

页码：223 / 223

共 50 条

[21] "Nadorcott" Decision of the Supreme Court of Spain (Tribunal Supremo) 11 June 2020-Case No. 282/2020
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2021, 52 (08) : 1086 - 1093
[22] "ZIPLOC" Decision of the Supreme Court of New Zealand 15 October 2020-Case No. [2020] NZSC 110
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2021, 52 (01) : 70 - 70
[23] "Calidad Pty v. Seiko Epson Corporation"Decision of the High Court of Australia 12 November 2020 – Case No. [2020] HCA 41
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 (5) : 636 - 636
[24] “Aspen”Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Italy (Consiglio di Stato) 13 March 2020 – Case No. 1832/2020
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 : 363 - 369
[25] “Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents”Decision of the Supreme Court 25 November 2020 (lodged on 7 February 2020) – Case No. 2977
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 : 1107 - 1114
[26] "Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents" Decision of the Supreme Court 25 November 2020 (lodged on 7 February 2020) - Case No. 2977
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2020, 51 (9) : 1107 - 1114
[27] “Federal Cartel Office v. Facebook (Bundeskartellamt v. Facebook)”Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 23 June 2020 – Case No. KVR 69/19 (ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:230620BKVR69.19.0)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 : 1137 - 1165
[28] “Cochrane Steel v. M-Systems”Decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal 27 May 2016 – Case No. 227/2015
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2016, 47 (8) : 993 - 993
[29] “ICMA Sistemas v. Ecoforest”Decision of the Supreme Court of Spain (Tribunal Supremo) 27 January 2022 – Case No. 46/2022
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 (8) : 1243 - 1251
[30] “Novus Nexus v. Solidas”Decision of the Supreme Court of Lithuania (Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas) 26 March 2020 – Case No. e3K-3-77-687/2020
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 (4) : 518 - 523

← 1 2 3 4 5 →