A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models

被引:0
|
作者
Shadi M. Hanandeh
Wassel A. Al-Bodour
Mustafa M. Hajij
机构
[1] Al-Balqa Applied University,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] The University of Jordan,Department of Civil Engineering
[3] Santa Clara University,Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Department
关键词
Supervised machine learning classifiers; Liquefaction; Cyclic resistance; Cyclic stress ratio;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Liquefaction of saturated granular soils is marked by the total loss of shear strength of soil under dynamic cyclic or transient loading conditions due to excess pore water pressure that builds up to produce a soil regime that mechanically performs as a liquid. The cone penetration test (CPT) is widely recognized as a means of evaluating liquefaction susceptibility. This study presents a comparative supervised machine learning-based assessment for CPT-based liquefaction data. In particular, this study views soil liquefaction as a binary classification problem, whether the soil is liquefied or not, by utilizing three supervised machine learning classifiers: support vector machine, Decision Trees, and Quadratic Discrimination Analysis. To build the supervised machine learning models, three different soil characterization data sets were selected by performing CPTs at specific locations. The first input data (input data-1) is constructed as a function of the Mean Grain Size (D50), Measured CPT Tip Resistance (qc), Earthquake Magnitude (M), and Cyclic Shear Resistance (CSR). The second input data (input data-2) employed D50, Normalized CPT Tip Resistance (qc−1), M, CSR. Finally, the third input data (input data-3) consists of D50, qc−1, M, the Maximum Ground Acceleration (amax), Effective Vertical Overburden Stress, and Total Overburden Stress. The significance feature analysis shows the most important feature for assessing liquefaction susceptibility in the soil using input data for model 1 is measured CPT Tip Resistance, for input data model 2 it is normalized CPT Tip Resistance, and finally, for input data model 3, it is measured CPT Tip Resistance. Conclusively, this study proposed simple and quick approaches to evaluate soil liquefaction susceptibility without complicated calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:4721 / 4734
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaporation Rate Prediction Using Advanced Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Study
    Al Sudani, Zainab Abdulelah
    Salem, Golam Saleh Ahmed
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [22] Estimation of Unconfined Aquifer Transmissivity Using a Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models
    Dashti, Zahra
    Nakhaei, Mohammad
    Vadiati, Meysam
    Karami, Gholam Hossein
    Kisi, Ozgur
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (12) : 4909 - 4931
  • [23] Estimation of Unconfined Aquifer Transmissivity Using a Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models
    Zahra Dashti
    Mohammad Nakhaei
    Meysam Vadiati
    Gholam Hossein Karami
    Ozgur Kisi
    Water Resources Management, 2023, 37 : 4909 - 4931
  • [24] Machine learning modelling for predicting soil liquefaction susceptibility
    Samui, P.
    Sitharam, T. G.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2011, 11 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [25] Analyzing the Performance of Univariate and Multivariate Machine Learning Models in Soil Movement Prediction: A Comparative Study
    Kumar, Praveen
    Priyanka, P.
    Dhanya, J.
    Uday, Kala Venkata
    Dutt, Varun
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 62368 - 62381
  • [26] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Microplastic Classification using FTIR Spectra
    Thar, Aeint Shune
    Laitrakun, Seksan
    Deepaisarn, Somrudee
    Opaprakasit, Pakorn
    Somnuake, Pattara
    Athikulwongse, Krit
    2023 18TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT SYMPOSIUM ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING, ISAI-NLP, 2023,
  • [27] Probabilistic capacity energy-based machine learning models for soil liquefaction reliability analysis
    Zhao, Zening
    Duan, Wei
    Cai, Guojun
    Wu, Meng
    Liu, Songyu
    Puppala, Anand J.
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2024, 338
  • [28] Using High Performance Computing for Liquefaction Hazard Assessment with Statistical Soil Models
    Chen, Jian
    Takeyama, Tomohide
    O-Tani, Hideyuki
    Fujita, Kohei
    Motoyama, Hiroki
    Hori, Muneo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2019, 16 (05)
  • [29] Comparative study of soil liquefaction potential using Spanish codes and Eurocodeo
    Luis Pastor, Jose
    Tomas, Roberto
    Cano, Miguel
    Riquelme, Adrian J.
    BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD GEOLOGICA MEXICANA, 2018, 70 (03): : 761 - 778
  • [30] Comparative Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Quality Prediction Using Various ParametersComparative Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Quality Prediction Using Various ParametersNiazkar et al.
    Majid Niazkar
    Reza Piraei
    Mohammad Reza Goodarzi
    Mohammad Javad Abedi
    Environmental Processes, 2025, 12 (1)