Patient and provider perspectives on the development of personalized medicine: a mixed-methods approach

被引:14
|
作者
Puryear L. [1 ]
Downs N. [1 ]
Nevedal A. [2 ]
Lewis E.T. [2 ]
Ormond K.E. [3 ]
Bregendahl M. [4 ]
Suarez C.J. [5 ]
David S.P. [4 ]
Charlap S. [6 ]
Chu I. [7 ]
Asch S.M. [4 ]
Pakdaman N. [4 ]
Chang S.-I. [4 ]
Cullen M.R. [7 ]
Palaniappan L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[2] Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Livermore, CA
[3] Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[4] Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, MC: 5475, Stanford, 94305, CA
[5] Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[6] GeneYes, LLC, Palo Alto, CA
[7] Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
关键词
Genetics; Patient-centered care; Personalized medicine; Physician decision support; Primary care;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-017-0349-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While genetic testing gains adoption in specialty services such as oncology, neurology, and cardiology, use of genetic and genomic testing has yet to be adopted as widely in primary care. The purpose of this study is to identify and compare patient and primary care provider (PCP) expectations of genetics services in primary care. Patient and PCP perspectives were assessed through a mixed-method approach combining an online survey and semi-structured interviews in a primary care department of a large academic medical institution. A convenience sample of 100 adult primary care patients and 26 PCPs was gathered. The survey and interview questions focused on perceptions of genetic testing, experience with genetic testing, and expectations of genetic services in primary care. Patients felt that their PCP was knowledgeable about genetic testing and expected their PCP to be the first to recognize a need for genetic testing based on family history. Nonetheless, patients reported that PCPs rarely used family history information to discuss genetic risks or order testing. In contrast, PCPs felt uncertain about the clinical utility and scientific value of genetic testing. PCPs were concerned that genetic testing could cause anxiety, frustration, discrimination, and reduced insurability, and that there was unequal access to testing. PCPs described themselves as being “gatekeepers” to genetic testing but did not feel confident or have the desire to become experts in genetic testing. However, PCPs were open to increasing their working knowledge of genetic testing. Within this academic medical center, there is a gap between what patients expect and what primary care providers feel they are adequately prepared to provide in terms of genetic testing services. © 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient perspectives of diabetes care in primary care networks in Singapore: a mixed-methods study
    Goh, Lay Hoon
    Szuecs, Anna
    Siah, Chiew Jiat Rosalind
    Lazarus, Monica A.
    Tai, E. Shyong
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Young, Doris Yee Ling
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [22] Frequent attenders in primary health care: a mixed-methods study of patient and staff perspectives
    Sharabani, Rachel
    Kagan, Ilya
    Cojocaru, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7135 - 7146
  • [23] A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews
    Pearson, Alan
    White, Heath
    Bath-Hextall, Fiona
    Salmond, Susan
    Apostolo, Joao
    Kirkpatrick, Pamela
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03): : 121 - 131
  • [24] Patient perspectives of diabetes care in primary care networks in Singapore: a mixed-methods study
    Lay Hoon Goh
    Anna Szücs
    Chiew Jiat Rosalind Siah
    Monica A Lazarus
    E Shyong Tai
    Jose M Valderas
    Doris Yee Ling Young
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [25] Patient and provider-level barriers to hepatitis C screening and linkage to care: A mixed-methods evaluation
    Higashi, Robin T.
    Jain, Mamta K.
    Quirk, Lisa
    Rich, Nicole E.
    Waljee, Akbar K.
    Turner, Barbara J.
    Lee, Simon Craddock
    Singal, Amit G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2020, 27 (07) : 680 - 689
  • [26] Patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU: A mixed-methods study of patient and family perspectives
    Vanstone, Meredith G.
    Krewulak, Karla
    Taneja, Shipra
    Swinton, Marilyn
    Fiest, Kirsten
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Debigare, Sylvie
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Marshall, John C.
    Muscedere, John G.
    Deane, Adam M.
    Finfer, Simon
    Myburgh, John A.
    Gouskos, Audrey
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Ball, Ian
    Mele, Tina
    Niven, Daniel J.
    English, Shane W.
    Verhovsek, Madeleine
    Cook, Deborah J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 81
  • [27] Interprofessional collaboration and patient-provider communication challenges in MS care: a mixed-methods needs assessment
    Peloquin, S.
    Schmierer, K.
    Oh, J.
    Leist, T.
    Murray, S.
    Lazure, P.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (2_SUPPL) : 731 - 732
  • [28] From didactic to personalized health and nutrition counselling: A mixed-methods review of the GALIDRAA approach in Nepal
    Cunningham, Kenda
    Suresh, Shalini
    Kjeldsberg, Cecilie
    Sapkota, Femila
    Shakya, Nabin
    Manandhar, Shraddha
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2019, 15 (02):
  • [29] A mixed-methods evaluation of college student and provider perspectives on a smartphone application for help-seeking after violence
    Anderson, Jocelyn C.
    Pollitt, Erin
    Crowley, Joseph
    Holbrook, Debra
    Moret, Jessica E. Draughon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2021, 69 (06) : 668 - 674
  • [30] A Culturally Sensitive, Mixed-Methods Approach to Analysing a Leadership Development Program
    Wardale, Dorothy
    Cameron, Roslyn
    Li, Jun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM 2015), 2015, : 390 - 395