Patient and provider perspectives on the development of personalized medicine: a mixed-methods approach

被引:14
|
作者
Puryear L. [1 ]
Downs N. [1 ]
Nevedal A. [2 ]
Lewis E.T. [2 ]
Ormond K.E. [3 ]
Bregendahl M. [4 ]
Suarez C.J. [5 ]
David S.P. [4 ]
Charlap S. [6 ]
Chu I. [7 ]
Asch S.M. [4 ]
Pakdaman N. [4 ]
Chang S.-I. [4 ]
Cullen M.R. [7 ]
Palaniappan L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[2] Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Livermore, CA
[3] Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[4] Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, MC: 5475, Stanford, 94305, CA
[5] Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
[6] GeneYes, LLC, Palo Alto, CA
[7] Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
关键词
Genetics; Patient-centered care; Personalized medicine; Physician decision support; Primary care;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-017-0349-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While genetic testing gains adoption in specialty services such as oncology, neurology, and cardiology, use of genetic and genomic testing has yet to be adopted as widely in primary care. The purpose of this study is to identify and compare patient and primary care provider (PCP) expectations of genetics services in primary care. Patient and PCP perspectives were assessed through a mixed-method approach combining an online survey and semi-structured interviews in a primary care department of a large academic medical institution. A convenience sample of 100 adult primary care patients and 26 PCPs was gathered. The survey and interview questions focused on perceptions of genetic testing, experience with genetic testing, and expectations of genetic services in primary care. Patients felt that their PCP was knowledgeable about genetic testing and expected their PCP to be the first to recognize a need for genetic testing based on family history. Nonetheless, patients reported that PCPs rarely used family history information to discuss genetic risks or order testing. In contrast, PCPs felt uncertain about the clinical utility and scientific value of genetic testing. PCPs were concerned that genetic testing could cause anxiety, frustration, discrimination, and reduced insurability, and that there was unequal access to testing. PCPs described themselves as being “gatekeepers” to genetic testing but did not feel confident or have the desire to become experts in genetic testing. However, PCPs were open to increasing their working knowledge of genetic testing. Within this academic medical center, there is a gap between what patients expect and what primary care providers feel they are adequately prepared to provide in terms of genetic testing services. © 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lung Cancer Screening in People With HIV: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient and Provider Perspectives
    Triplette, Matthew
    Brown, Meagan C.
    Snidarich, Madison
    Budak, Jehan Z.
    Giustini, Nicholas
    Murphy, Nicholas
    Romine, Perrin E.
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    Crothers, Kristina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 65 (04) : 608 - 617
  • [2] Quality Reporting by Payers: A Mixed-Methods Study of Provider Perspectives and Practices
    Garabedian, Laura F.
    Sinaiko, Anna D.
    Ross-Degnan, Dennis
    Abu-Jaber, Tariq
    Hoefer, Martha
    Oddleifson, Stephanie
    Wagner, Anita K.
    [J]. QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 27 (03) : 157 - 164
  • [3] Provider perspectives on general practice in Henan, China: a mixed-methods study
    Zhu, Jiming
    Ariana, Proochista
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [4] DEVELOPMENT OF AWOMEN'S HEALTH CURRICULUM FOR INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENTS: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH
    Hallett, Laura D.
    Casas, Rachel S.
    Gerber, Megan R.
    Rich, Catherine A.
    Battaglia, Tracy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 : S187 - S187
  • [5] A Network-Based Mixed Methods Approach to Analyze Current Perspectives on Personalized Oncological Medicine in Austria
    Stelzer, Ines Viktoria
    Sierawska, Anna
    Buyx, Alena
    Simon, Judit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (04): : 1 - 14
  • [6] A Mixed-Methods Approach to Humanistic Interprofessional Faculty Development
    Fornari, Alice
    Tortez, Leanne M.
    Lay, Monika
    Hirsch, Bruce
    Tanzi, Donna
    Friedman, Isabel
    Ricardo, Alison P.
    Pekmezaris, Renee
    Branch, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2018, 38 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [7] Spiritual Development and Education: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Approach
    Yocum, Russell
    [J]. RELIGION & EDUCATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 80 - 99
  • [8] Destination avoidance and scale development: A mixed-methods approach
    Fan, Yulan
    Wong, IpKin Anthony
    Leong, Aliana Man Wai
    Sun, Danni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 60 : 416 - 428
  • [9] Patient perspectives of a young adult renal clinic: A mixed-methods evaluation
    Tong, Allison
    Gow, Kate
    Wong, Germaine
    Henning, Paul
    Carroll, Robert
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 20 (05) : 352 - 359
  • [10] Asexuality: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Brotto, Lori A.
    Knudson, Gail
    Inskip, Jess
    Rhodes, Katherine
    Erskine, Yvonne
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 39 (03) : 599 - 618