The threat of political bargaining to climate mitigation in Brazil

被引:0
|
作者
Pedro R. R. Rochedo
Britaldo Soares-Filho
Roberto Schaeffer
Eduardo Viola
Alexandre Szklo
André F. P. Lucena
Alexandre Koberle
Juliana Leroy Davis
Raoni Rajão
Regis Rathmann
机构
[1] COPPE,Departamento de Engenharia de Produção
[2] Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,undefined
[3] Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto,undefined
[4] UFMG,undefined
[5] Instituto de Relações Internacionais,undefined
[6] UNB,undefined
[7] UFMG,undefined
来源
Nature Climate Change | 2018年 / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In exchange for political support, the Brazilian government is signalling landholders to increase deforestation, putting the country’s contribution to the Paris Agreement at risk1. The President of Brazil has signed provisionary acts and decrees lowering environmental licensing requirements, suspending the ratification of indigenous lands, reducing the size of protected areas and facilitating land grabbers to obtain the deeds of illegally deforested areas2. This could undermine the success of Brazil’s CO2 emission reductions through control of deforestation in the previous decade. Integrated assessment models are tools to assess progress in fulfilling global efforts to curb climate change3,4. Using integrated assessment models developed for Brazil, we explore 2 °C-compliant CO2 emission scenarios estimating the effort needed in other sectors of the economy to compensate for the weakening of environmental governance, potentially resulting in higher deforestation emissions. We found that the risk of reversals of recent trends in deforestation governance could impose a burden on other sectors that would need to deploy not yet mature technologies to compensate for higher emissions from land-use change. The abandonment of deforestation control policies and the political support for predatory agricultural practices make it impossible to meet targets consistent with Brazil’s contribution to a 2 °C world.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 698
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is public awareness and perceived threat of climate change associated with governmental mitigation targets?
    Aaron Drummond
    Lauren C. Hall
    James D. Sauer
    Matthew A. Palmer
    Climatic Change, 2018, 149 : 159 - 171
  • [22] POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND LABOR CLIMATE IN BRAZIL - SCHLAGHECK,JL
    ROBOCK, SH
    MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1978, 101 (02) : 61 - 61
  • [23] Mitigation and the geoengineering threat
    Moreno-Cruz, Juan B.
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 41 : 248 - 263
  • [24] Interactions between climate change mitigation and adaptation: The case of hydropower in Brazil
    Lucena, Andre F. P.
    Hejazi, Mohamad
    Vasquez-Arroyo, Eveline
    Turner, Sean
    Koberle, Alexandre C.
    Daenzer, Kathryn
    Rochedo, Pedro R. R.
    Kober, Tom
    Cai, Yongxia
    Beach, Robert H.
    Gernaat, David
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    van der Zwaan, Bob
    ENERGY, 2018, 164 : 1161 - 1177
  • [25] THREAT BARGAINING GAMES WITH A VARIABLE POPULATION
    LAHIRI, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 1990, 19 (01) : 91 - 100
  • [26] THE EFFECT OF THREAT UPON INTERPERSONAL BARGAINING
    DEUTSCH, M
    KRAUSS, RM
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 61 (02): : 181 - 189
  • [27] Veto Threat Bargaining with a Bicameral Congress
    Guenther, Scott M.
    Kernell, Samuel
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2021, 74 (03) : 628 - 644
  • [28] EFFECTS OF THREAT OF LOSSES ON DUOPOLY BARGAINING
    MURPHY, JL
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1966, 80 (02): : 296 - 313
  • [29] THREAT BARGAINING PROBLEMS WITH CORRELATED BELIEFS
    LAHIRI, S
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1991, 37 (03) : 229 - 233
  • [30] COLLECTIVE BARGAINING THREAT TO PUBLIC EDUCATION
    RILEY, T
    THRUST-FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 1975, 4 (04): : 12 - 13