Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science

被引:0
|
作者
Jake M. Hofman
Duncan J. Watts
Susan Athey
Filiz Garip
Thomas L. Griffiths
Jon Kleinberg
Helen Margetts
Sendhil Mullainathan
Matthew J. Salganik
Simine Vazire
Alessandro Vespignani
Tal Yarkoni
机构
[1] Microsoft Research,Department of Computer and Information Science
[2] University of Pennsylvania,The Annenberg School of Communication
[3] University of Pennsylvania,Operations, Information, and Decisions Department
[4] University of Pennsylvania,Graduate School of Business
[5] Stanford University,Department of Sociology
[6] Princeton University,Department of Psychology
[7] Princeton University,Department of Computer Science
[8] Princeton University,Department of Computer Science
[9] Cornell University,Department of Information Science
[10] Cornell University,Oxford Internet Institute
[11] University of Oxford,Public Policy Programme
[12] The Alan Turing Institute,Booth School of Business
[13] University of Chicago,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
[14] University of Melbourne,Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio
[15] Northeastern University,technical Systems
[16] University of Texas at Austin,Department of Psychology
来源
Nature | 2021年 / 595卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions—the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes—and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条