Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science

被引:0
|
作者
Jake M. Hofman
Duncan J. Watts
Susan Athey
Filiz Garip
Thomas L. Griffiths
Jon Kleinberg
Helen Margetts
Sendhil Mullainathan
Matthew J. Salganik
Simine Vazire
Alessandro Vespignani
Tal Yarkoni
机构
[1] Microsoft Research,Department of Computer and Information Science
[2] University of Pennsylvania,The Annenberg School of Communication
[3] University of Pennsylvania,Operations, Information, and Decisions Department
[4] University of Pennsylvania,Graduate School of Business
[5] Stanford University,Department of Sociology
[6] Princeton University,Department of Psychology
[7] Princeton University,Department of Computer Science
[8] Princeton University,Department of Computer Science
[9] Cornell University,Department of Information Science
[10] Cornell University,Oxford Internet Institute
[11] University of Oxford,Public Policy Programme
[12] The Alan Turing Institute,Booth School of Business
[13] University of Chicago,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
[14] University of Melbourne,Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio
[15] Northeastern University,technical Systems
[16] University of Texas at Austin,Department of Psychology
来源
Nature | 2021年 / 595卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions—the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes—and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science
    Hofman, Jake M.
    Watts, Duncan J.
    Athey, Susan
    Garip, Filiz
    Griffiths, Thomas L.
    Kleinberg, Jon
    Margetts, Helen
    Mullainathan, Sendhil
    Salganik, Matthew J.
    Vazire, Simine
    Vespignani, Alessandro
    Yarkoni, Tal
    [J]. NATURE, 2021, 595 (7866) : 181 - 188
  • [2] Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction
    de Marchi, Scott
    Page, Scotte E.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2016, 14 (04) : 1169 - 1170
  • [3] Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction
    Ciflikli, Gokhan
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2017, 15 (04) : 649 - 650
  • [4] Integrating exploration and prediction in computational psychotherapy science: proof of concept
    Fisher, Hadar
    Stone, Suzannah J.
    Zilcha-Mano, Sigal
    Goldstein, Pavel
    Anderson, Timothy
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 14
  • [5] EXPLANATION AND PREDICTION IN VEGETATION SCIENCE
    WIEGLEB, G
    [J]. VEGETATIO, 1989, 83 (1-2): : 17 - 34
  • [6] SOCIAL SCIENCE Computational Social Science
    Lazer, David
    Pentland, Alex
    Adamic, Lada
    Aral, Sinan
    Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo
    Brewer, Devon
    Christakis, Nicholas
    Contractor, Noshir
    Fowler, James
    Gutmann, Myron
    Jebara, Tony
    King, Gary
    Macy, Michael
    Roy, Deb
    Van Alstyne, Marshall
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5915) : 721 - 723
  • [7] Prediction and explanation in social systems
    Hofman, Jake M.
    Sharma, Amit
    Watts, Duncan J.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2017, 355 (6324) : 486 - 488
  • [8] INTERSECTIONALITY AND SOCIAL EXPLANATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH
    Clarke, Averil Y.
    McCall, Leslie
    [J]. DU BOIS REVIEW-SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ON RACE, 2013, 10 (02) : 349 - 363
  • [9] Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science
    Cleland, Carol E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 62 (03): : 551 - 582
  • [10] Computational social science
    Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2010, 2 (03): : 259 - 271