Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning

被引:0
|
作者
Merav Ahissar
Shaul Hochstein
机构
[1] Weizmann Institute of Science,Center for Higher Brain Functions, Department of Neurobiology
[2] Institute of Life Sciences,Center for Nerual Computation, Department of Neurobiology
[3] Hebrew University of Jerusalem,undefined
[4] Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience,undefined
[5] UCSF,undefined
来源
Nature | 1997年 / 387卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Practising simple visual tasks leads to a dramatic improvement in performing them. This learning is specific to the stimuli used for training. We show here that the degree of specificity depends on the difficulty of the training conditions. We find that the pattern of specificities maps onto the pattern of receptive field selectivities along the visual pathway. With easy conditions, learning generalizes across orientation and retinal position, matching the spatial generalization of higher visual areas. As task difficulty increases, learning becomes more specific with respect to both orientation and position, matching the fine spatial retinotopy exhibited by lower areas. Consequently, we enjoy the benefits of learning generalization when possible, and of fine grain but specific training when necessary. The dynamics of learning show a corresponding feature. Improvement begins with easy cases (when the subject is allowed long processing times) and only subsequently proceeds to harder cases. This learning cascade implies that easy conditions guide the learning of hard ones. Taken together, the specificity and dynamics suggest that learning proceeds as a countercurrent along the cortical hierarchy. Improvement begins at higher generalizing levels, which, in turn, direct harder-condition learning to the subdomain of their lower-level inputs. As predicted by this reverse hierarchy model, learning can be effective using only difficult trials, but on condition that learning onset has previously been enabled. A single prolonged presentation suffices to initiate learning. We call this single-encounter enabling effect 'eureka'.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 406
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of task difficulty on cerebral blood flow during perceptual matching of faces
    Grady, CL
    Horwitz, B
    Pietrini, P
    Mentis, MJ
    Ungerleider, LG
    Rapoport, SI
    Haxby, JV
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1996, 4 (04) : 227 - 239
  • [42] Foveal feedback in perceptual processing: Contamination of neural representations and task difficulty effects
    Contemori, Giulio
    Oletto, Carolina Maria
    Battaglini, Luca
    Motterle, Elena
    Bertamini, Marco
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (10):
  • [43] Perceptual arid cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction
    Muller-Gass, Alexandra
    Schroeger, Erich
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1136 (01) : 169 - 177
  • [44] Perceptual, procedural, and task learning for an auditory temporal discrimination task
    Zhen, Leslie Q.
    Pratt, Sheila R.
    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023, 153 (03): : 1823 - 1835
  • [45] The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning
    Seitz, Aaron R.
    Watanabe, Takeo
    VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (21) : 2604 - 2610
  • [46] Task-specific disruption of perceptual learning
    Seitzt, AR
    Yamagishi, N
    Werner, B
    Goda, N
    Kawato, M
    Watanabe, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (41) : 14895 - 14900
  • [47] Perceptual learning transfer in an appetitive Pavlovian task
    Artigas, Antonio A.
    Prados, Jose
    LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2017, 45 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [48] Interocular transfer in perceptual learning of a Vernier task
    Young, KG
    Li, RW
    Levi, DM
    Klein, SA
    Huang, EY
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U431 - U431
  • [49] Perceptual learning transfer in an appetitive Pavlovian task
    Antonio A. Artigas
    Jose Prados
    Learning & Behavior, 2017, 45 : 115 - 123
  • [50] TASK-DIFFICULTY AND DRIVE IN VERBAL-LEARNING
    STANDISH, RR
    CHAMPION, RA
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 59 (06): : 361 - 365