Evaluation, ranking, and selection of pretreatment methods for the conversion of biomass to biogas using multi-criteria decision-making approach

被引:3
|
作者
Vannarath A. [1 ]
Thalla A.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangalore, 575025, Karnataka
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Decision-making; Design of experiments; Pretreatment; Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution;
D O I
10.1007/s10669-019-09749-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Lignocellulosic biomass resources include agri-waste and agri-biomass which are utilized as a suitable feedstock for bioenergy production. The recalcitrant nature of these biomass can be reduced by the application of various pretreatment methods to access the cellulosic content. This study depicts the evaluation and ranking of different pretreatment methods, and selecting the rank 1 as the best pretreatment method using multiple attribute decision-making approach to facilitate the increased biogas yield. The evaluation was done using technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and integrated design of experiments (DoE)–TOPSIS. Seven alternatives with five relevant attributes were adopted for this study. Based on the above decision-making framework, alkaline pretreatment (Ca(OH)2 (8%)) option was ranked first for both the techniques. The second and third options were NaOH and NH3.H2O (10%) pretreatment, respectively. The integrated DoE–TOPSIS method has reduced the uncertainty in results by considering different weight sets and replications. The model results and experimental results were in good agreement and portray the best pretreatment method to be employed in the anaerobic digestion, thus, minimizing the series of digestion test during the downstream process of pretreatment aided anaerobic digestion. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 525
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270
  • [2] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [3] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [4] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [5] An Alternative Ranking Approach and Its Usage in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Cengiz Kahraman
    A. Cagri Tolga
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2009, 2 (3) : 219 - 235
  • [6] An Alternative Ranking Approach and Its Usage in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Tolga, A. Cagri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2009, 2 (03): : 219 - 235
  • [7] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART L-JOURNAL OF MATERIALS-DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 226 (L4) : 266 - 285
  • [8] Optimal Selection of Stock Portfolios Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Jing, Dongmei
    Imeni, Mohsen
    Edalatpanah, Seyyed Ahmad
    Alburaikan, Alhanouf
    Khalifa, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [9] A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR GREENOVATIVE SUPPLIER SELECTION
    Buyukselcuk, Elif Caloglu
    Tozan, Hakan
    Vayvay, Ozalp
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 29 (02): : 283 - 301
  • [10] The Preference Ranking of Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis Methods Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Operational Research Centre in Healthcare, Near East University, TRNC, Mersin 10, Nicosia
    99138, Cyprus
    不详
    28903, Spain
    不详
    99138, Cyprus
    不详
    NY
    10065, United States
    不详
    [J]. IET. Conf. Proc., 1600, 14 (314-320):