Measurement of transit-oriented development (TOD) using GIS technique: a case study

被引:9
|
作者
Khare R. [1 ]
Villuri V.G.K. [2 ]
Chaurasia D. [3 ]
Kumari S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Remote Sensing and GIS lab, Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad
[2] Faculty of Geomatics, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad
[3] School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal
[4] Central University of Jharkhand, Jharkhand
关键词
India; Multi-criteria evaluation (MCE); Station-level planning; TOD index;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-021-07142-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The renewed enthusiasm for sustainable development and interest in transit needs to prompt the advancement of new transit-oriented development (TOD). Under the “smart cities” mission, smart growth development is being built globally. Government initiates many programs to increase ridership in public transport. However, investment in infrastructure such as for TOD without understanding the existing situation is complex. In any case, there are only a few studies that emphasize station-level planning. Our study mainly focuses on the measurement of station-level TOD on a quantitative scale. A case study of Bhopal, India, has been done. This study considers seven criteria: density, diversity, mixed-use of land, walkability, travel behavior of TOD residents, street block pattern, and economic development. The study presents an approach based on a geographical information system (GIS) for sustainable urban development. Multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) is utilized to determine the level of TOD for Bhopal based on the chosen criteria. MCE results show the quantitative value of performance measures, which can be used to rank and compare different stations accordingly. Measuring the TOD level is helpful for efficient, sustainable planning. This examination will provide sustainable station-level planning for the urban planner. © 2021, Saudi Society for Geosciences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating equitable Transit-Oriented development (TOD) via the Node-Place-People model
    Zhao, Yingrui
    Hu, Songhua
    Zhang, Ming
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 185
  • [42] Countering sprawl with transit-oriented development
    Belzer, D
    Autler, G
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 19 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [43] PROSPECT OF THE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA
    Chen, Xueming
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 2 (01): : 83 - 93
  • [44] Suburbanization and transit-oriented development in China
    Cervero, Robert
    Day, Jennifer
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (05) : 315 - 323
  • [45] Policy challenges for transit-oriented development
    Hakkaart, Aaron
    Morrissey, John Edward
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING, 2014, 167 (04) : 175 - 184
  • [46] Unraveling the diversity in transit-oriented development
    Choi, Yunkyung
    Guhathakurta, Subhrajit
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 182
  • [47] Overcoming the barriers to Transit-Oriented Development
    Bolleter, Julian Alexander
    Myers, Zoe
    Hooper, Paula
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2021, 57 (3-4) : 188 - 205
  • [48] From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development
    Renne, John L.
    [J]. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [49] Creating Added Value for Urban Transit in Developing Country: A Case Study of Transit-Oriented Development Project
    Saroji, Gunawan
    Berawi, Mohammed Ali
    Sumabrata, Jachrizal
    Ibrahim, Bernard Elpetino
    Miraj, Perdana
    [J]. ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2020, 24 (04): : 33 - 47
  • [50] Towards Sustainable Urban Planning Through Transit-Oriented Development (A Case Study: Tehran)
    Motieyan, Hamid
    Mesgari, Mohammad Saadi
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2017, 6 (12):