Developing a research agenda in science education

被引:0
|
作者
Simmons P.E. [1 ]
Brunkhorst H. [2 ]
Lunetta V. [3 ]
Penick J. [4 ]
Peterson J. [5 ]
Pietrucha B. [6 ]
Staver J. [7 ]
机构
[1] University of Missouri-St. Louis, Institute for Mathematics and Science Education and Learning Technologies, Regional Center for Education and Work, St. Louis, MO 63121, One University Blvd.
[2] California State University, Institute for Science Education, San Bernardino, CA 92407
[3] Penn State University, 155 Chambers, University Park
[4] North Carolina State University, Department of Math, Science, and Technology Education, 326 Poe Hall, Raleigh
[5] National Science Teachers Association, Arlington, VA 22201
[6] Bradley Beach, NJ 07720
[7] Kansas State University, 252 Bluemont Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
关键词
Professional organizations; Research agenda; Science education;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-005-4424-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Science Summit reinforced a question upon which many of us in science education are focused: How can we, the science education community of researchers, practitioners, and consumers, lead policy? We include a brief review of the No Child Left Behind Act and its implications for teachers, and elaborate about one ongoing and growing effort to answer the concerns about the paucity of research expressed at the Summit. We describe a unique and growing collaboration across professional science education and science organizations and societies that focuses on the development of a research agenda. The term 'consilience' refers to the "jumping together of knowledge" that leads to scientific advancements, progressive, creative, fluid scientific research and intellectual capacity to move a research community toward an enlightened research agenda. A coherent research agenda enables us to specify what we know, what we need to know, and how research can be employed for creating and implementing policy. The use of a dynamic organizer (such as Pasteur's Quadrant) for a research matrix of topics provides a possible structure for organizing and cataloging research questions, designs, findings from past studies, needed areas for research, and policy implications. Through this unique collaboration, the science education community can better focus on needs and priorities and ensure that teachers, policy makers, scientists, and researchers in education at local through national levels have an important stake in research priorities and actions. © 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 252
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条