Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with unknown primary: why, when and how?

被引:0
|
作者
Prasanna Santhanam
Sangeeta Chandramahanti
Alexander Kroiss
Run Yu
Philippe Ruszniewski
Rakesh Kumar
David Taïeb
机构
[1] Marshall University,Section of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine
[2] Medical University Innsbruck,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[3] Cedars-Sinai Medical Center,Division of Endocrinology and Carcinoid and Neuroendocrine Tumor Center
[4] Beaujon Hospital and Paris-Diderot University,Department of Gastroenterology
[5] All India Institute of Medical Sciences,Pancreatology
[6] Aix-Marseille University,Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Nuclear Medicine
[7] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital
[8] Aix-Marseille University,Inserm UMR1068 Marseille Cancerology Research Center
关键词
Neuroendocrine tumors; Positron emission tomography; Gallium radioisotopes; Somatostatin; F-DOPA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with unknown primary (CUP-NET) are associated with a poor prognosis (10-year survival 22 %), grade 1 and 2 NETs having a more favorable outcome than grade 3 (also called carcinoma). There is evidence that an effort should be made to localize the primary tumor even in the presence of metastasis because resection of the primary tumor(s) may improve disease-free and overall survival, and because the choice of chemotherapeutic agent depends on the location of the primary tumor. Localization of the tumors remains challenging and often relies on a combination of radiological, endoscopic and functional imaging. The functional imaging protocol for evaluation of these patients has historically relied on somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). However, the sensitivity and specificity of SRS may be unsatisfactory, especially for NETs of midgut origin. Newer PET radiotracers such as 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs (68Ga-DOTA-SSTa) and 18F-DOPA have shown promise. In direct comparisons between 68Ga-DOTA-SSTa PET/CT and 99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide/111In-pentetreotide SPECT(/CT), 68Ga-DOTA-SSTa performed better than other techniques, giving a compelling reason for switching from SPECT/CT to PET/CT imaging. 18F-DOPA performs better than SRS and CT in well-differentiated NETs of the small intestine. For detecting pancreatic NETs, the high background uptake of 18F-DOPA by the normal exocrine pancreas can be somewhat overcome by pretreatment with carbidopa. We have suggested a protocol in which SRS is replaced by one of the two agents (preferably with 68Ga-DOTA-SSTa, alternatively 18F-DOPA) as first-line nuclear tracer for detection of CUP-NET in patients with well-differentiated NETs and 18F-FDG PET/CT may be an additional diagnostic test for poorly differentiated tumors and for prognostication. In the near future, it is expected that patients with CUP-NET will benefit from newly developed PET approaches (radiopharmaceuticals) and intraoperative PET imaging.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1144 / 1155
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with unknown primary: why, when and how?
    Santhanam, Prasanna
    Chandramahanti, Sangeeta
    Kroiss, Alexander
    Yu, Run
    Ruszniewski, Philippe
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Taieb, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (07) : 1144 - 1155
  • [2] Management of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary
    Alexandraki, Krystallenia
    Angelousi, Anna
    Boutzios, Georgios
    Kyriakopoulos, Georgios
    Rontogianni, Dimitra
    Kaltsas, Gregory
    REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2017, 18 (04): : 423 - 431
  • [3] Management of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary
    Krystallenia Alexandraki
    Anna Angelousi
    Georgios Boutzios
    Georgios Kyriakopoulos
    Dimitra Rontogianni
    Gregory Kaltsas
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 2017, 18 : 423 - 431
  • [4] Nuclear Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Pollard, Janet
    McNeely, Parren
    Menda, Yusuf
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 29 (02) : 209 - +
  • [5] Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Brabander, Tessa
    Kwekkeboom, Dik J.
    Feelders, Richard A.
    Brouwers, Adrienne H.
    Teunissen, Jaap J. M.
    NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2015, 44 : 73 - 87
  • [6] Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Primary Is the Primary Site Really Not Known?
    Bergsland, Emily K.
    Nakakura, Eric K.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (09) : 889 - 890
  • [7] 18F-DOPA and Other Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging Unknown Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Schillaci, Orazio
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (03) : 357 - 359
  • [8] Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Primary in the Setting of Cytoreductive Hepatectomy
    Ammann, Markus
    Gudmundsdottir, Hallbera
    Hackl, Hubert
    Antwi, Stella K. Adjei
    Santol, Jonas
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Thiels, Cornelius A.
    Warner, Susanne G.
    Truty, Mark J.
    Kendrick, Michael L.
    Smoot, Rory L.
    Nagorney, David M.
    Cleary, Sean P.
    Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R.
    Starlinger, Patrick P.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (08) : 4931 - 4941
  • [9] Everolimus in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Unknown Primary
    Singh, Simron
    Carnaghi, Carlo
    Buzzoni, Roberto
    Pommier, Rodney F.
    Raderer, Markus
    Tomasek, Jiri
    Lahner, Harald
    Valle, Juan W.
    Voi, Maurizio
    Bubuteishvili-Pacaud, Lida
    Lincy, Jeremie
    Wolin, Edward
    Okita, Natsuko
    Libutti, Steven K.
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Kulke, Matthew
    Strosberg, Jonathan
    Yao, James C.
    Pavel, Marianne E.
    Fazio, Nicola
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 106 (03) : 211 - 220
  • [10] NUCLEAR SYMBIOSIS - WHY, WHEN AND HOW
    STEWART, HB
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 1978, 5 (8-10) : 527 - 549