Magnitude Effects in Delay and Probability Discounting When Monetary and Medical Treatment Outcomes Are Discounted

被引:0
|
作者
Jeffrey N. Weatherly
Heather K. Terrell
机构
[1] University of North Dakota,
来源
The Psychological Record | 2014年 / 64卷
关键词
Delay discounting; Probability discounting; Money; Medical treatment; University students;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Delay and probability discounting occur when the subjective value of an outcome decreases because it is delayed or uncertain, respectively. Research using monetary outcomes has shown that both types of discounting are influenced by the magnitude of the outcome, but in the opposite direction. In Experiment 1, university participants completed a delay-discounting task involving hypothetical monetary ($100 or $100,000) or medical treatment (acne or brain cancer) outcomes. In Experiment 2, university participants completed a probability-discounting task involving those same outcomes. Results from Experiment 1 replicated previous research in that participants discounted the “smaller” outcomes ($100 & acne treatment) more than the “larger” ones ($100,000 & brain-cancer treatment). Results from Experiment 2 demonstrated that this magnitude effect reversed for probability discounting of the monetary outcomes, with $100,000 discounted more than $100. However, acne treatment was discounted more than brain-cancer treatment. This study represents the novel finding that the magnitude effect for medical outcomes may not reverse between delay and probability discounting as it does for monetary outcomes. The results suggest that delay and probability discounting are at least partially independent.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 440
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting
    Hinvest, Neal S.
    Anderson, Ian M.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (06): : 1072 - 1084
  • [22] Delay Discounting of Monetary Outcomes by Justice-Involved Male Adolescents and College Students
    Kristen M. Brogan
    John T. Rapp
    M. Christopher Newland
    The Psychological Record, 2025, 75 (1) : 111 - 136
  • [23] Transactional Problem Content in Cost Discounting: Parallel Effects for Probability and Delay
    Jones, Stephen
    Oaksford, Mike
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (03) : 739 - 747
  • [24] Effects of reward magnitude frames on measures of delay discounting in a hypothetical money scenario
    Harman, Michael
    Kodak, Tiffany
    McKerchar, Todd
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2020, 114 (02) : 193 - 202
  • [25] The effects of age on reward magnitude processing in the monetary incentive delay task
    Dhingra, Isha
    Zhang, Sheng
    Zhornitsky, Simon
    Le, Thang M.
    Wang, Wuyi
    Chao, Herta H.
    Levy, Ifat
    Li, Chiang-Shan R.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2020, 207
  • [26] On Four Types of Devaluation of Outcomes Due to Their Costs: Delay, Probability, Effort, and Social Discounting
    Wojciech Białaszek
    Paweł Ostaszewski
    Leonard Green
    Joel Myerson
    The Psychological Record, 2019, 69 : 415 - 424
  • [27] On Four Types of Devaluation of Outcomes Due to Their Costs: Delay, Probability, Effort, and Social Discounting
    Bialaszek, Wojciech
    Ostaszewski, Pawel
    Green, Leonard
    Myerson, Joel
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2019, 69 (03): : 415 - 424
  • [28] Comparison of potentially real versus hypothetical food outcomes in delay and probability discounting tasks
    Robertson, Stephen H.
    Rasmussen, Erin B.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2018, 149 : 8 - 15
  • [29] RATES OF DELAY AND PROBABILITY DISCOUNTING OF NORTHERN PLAINS AMERICAN INDIANS DISCOUNTING INDIAN AND MAJORITY CULTURE-SPECIFIC OUTCOMES
    Weatherly, Jeffrey N.
    McDonald, J. Douglas
    Derenne, Adam
    AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (03): : 23 - 41
  • [30] A job with a future? Delay discounting, magnitude effects, and domain independence of utility for career decisions
    Schoenfelder, TE
    Hantula, DA
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 62 (01) : 43 - 55