A Conceptual Approach for a Quantitative Economic Analysis of Farmers’ Decision-Making Regarding Animal Welfare

被引:0
|
作者
É. Gocsik
H. W. Saatkamp
C. C. de Lauwere
A. G. J. M. Oude Lansink
机构
[1] Wageningen University,Business Economics Group
[2] Agricultural Economics Research Institute,undefined
[3] LEI Wageningen UR,undefined
关键词
Animal welfare; Economic decision-making; Barriers of adoption; Trade-offs; Farmers’ decision support;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Decisions related to animal welfare (AW) standards depend on farmer’s multiple goals and values and are constrained by a wide range of external and internal forces. The aim of this paper is twofold, i.e., (1) to develop a theoretical framework for farmers’ AW decisions that incorporates farmers’ goals, use and non-use values and (2) to present an approach to empirically implement the theoretical framework. The farmer as a head of the farm household makes choices regarding production to maximize the utility of the household. The overall utility of the farmer is determined by his multiple objectives. For the analysis of multi-objective problems, the multiple criteria decision-making paradigm provides an appropriate theoretical framework. However, theories from the field of social-psychology are needed to facilitate the identification of all relevant aspects in the decision making (i.e., factors that explain behavior). The practical use of the conceptual framework is demonstrated using a simple numerical application of a multi-objective programming model. Two workshops were devoted to examining the scientific consistency and the practical usefulness of the approach. Implementing this approach will increase knowledge of the main factors and barriers that determine farmers’ decisions with regard to AW standards. This knowledge is relevant during the development of new AW concepts that aims to supply products that comply with above-legal AW standards for middle-market segments.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 308
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contingency in Economic Decision-making
    Ticha, Milena
    [J]. CONTINGENCY IN THE EDUCATION, ART AND SPORT, 2017, : 120 - 129
  • [32] Economic Decision-Making in Parrots
    Anastasia Krasheninnikova
    Friederike Höner
    Laurie O’Neill
    Elisabetta Penna
    Auguste M. P. von Bayern
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [33] Time and Economic Decision-making
    Ticha, Milena
    [J]. TIME IN THE EDUCATION, ART AND SPORT: INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE, 2014, : 107 - 116
  • [34] Economic evaluation for decision-making
    Gray, A
    Vale, L
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, : 59 - 75
  • [35] Economic Decision-Making in Parrots
    Krasheninnikova, Anastasia
    Hoener, Friederike
    O'Neill, Laurie
    Penna, Elisabetta
    von Bayern, Auguste M. P.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [36] Mentalizing in economic decision-making
    Polezzi, David
    Daum, Irene
    Rubaltelli, Enrico
    Lotto, Lorella
    Civai, Claudia
    Sartori, Giuseppe
    Rumiati, Rino
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 190 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [37] GOVERNMENT ECONOMIC DECISION-MAKING
    LOMAX, DF
    [J]. NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1977, (FEB): : 46 - 55
  • [38] FROM ECONOMIC TO POLITICAL ANALYSIS OF LIBRARY DECISION-MAKING
    RAFFEL, JA
    [J]. COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 1974, 35 (06): : 412 - 423
  • [39] Economic Rationality in Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Screening: A Case Study in Quebec
    Ho, Van Hoa
    Giguere, Yves
    Reinharz, Daniel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEONATAL SCREENING, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [40] Farmers' decision-making process under drought
    Keshavarz, Marzieh
    Karami, Ezatollah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2014, 108 : 43 - 56