Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries

被引:0
|
作者
Rick Gilsing
Anna Wilbik
Paul Grefen
Oktay Turetken
Baris Ozkan
Onat Ege Adali
Frank Berkers
机构
[1] Eindhoven University of Technology,
[2] DKE,undefined
[3] Maastricht University,undefined
[4] Atos Digital Transformation Consulting,undefined
[5] TNO,undefined
来源
关键词
Business model evaluation; Key performance indicators; Linguistic summarization; Intentional linguistic summaries; Business model innovation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To sustain competitiveness in contemporary, fast-paced markets, organizations increasingly focus on innovating their business models to enhance current value propositions or to explore novel sources of value creation. However, business model innovation is a complex task, characterized by shifting characteristics in terms of uncertainty, data availability and its impact on decision making. To cope with such challenges, business model evaluation is advocated to make sense of novel business models and to support decision making. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are frequently used in business model evaluation to structure the performance assessment of these models and to evaluate their strategic implications, in turn aiding business model decision making. However, given the shifting characteristics of the innovation process, the application and effectiveness of KPIs depend significantly on how such KPIs are defined. The techniques proposed in the existing literature typically generate or use quantitatively oriented KPIs, which are not well-suited for the early phases of the business model innovation process. Therefore, following a design science research methodology, we have developed a novel method for defining business model KPIs, taking into account the characteristics of the innovation process, offering holistic support toward decision making. Building on theory on linguistic summarization, we use a set of structured templates to define qualitative KPIs that are suitable to support early-phase decision making. In addition, we show how these KPIs can be gradually quantified to support later phases of the innovation process. We have evaluated our method by applying it in two real-life business cases, interviewing 13 industry experts to assess its utility.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 996
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
    Gilsing, Rick
    Wilbik, Anna
    Grefen, Paul
    Turetken, Oktay
    Ozkan, Baris
    Adali, Onat Ege
    Berkers, Frank
    [J]. SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2021, 20 (04): : 965 - 996
  • [2] Intentional Linguistic Summaries for Collaborative Business Model Radars
    Wilbik, Anna
    Gilsing, Rick
    Turetken, Oktay
    Ozkan, Baris
    Grefen, Paul
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2020,
  • [3] Defining key windpower performance indicators
    Roberts, Dave
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 2007, 111 (06) : 116 - 116
  • [4] Business Process Model of Key Performance Indicators Harvesting and Measuring
    Rabova, Ivana
    St'astny, Jiri
    [J]. DIVAI 2014: 10TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON DISTANCE LEARNING IN APPLIED INFORMATICS, 2014, : 473 - 481
  • [5] Deriving Key Performance Indicators from Business Process Model
    Repa, Vaclav
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES IN BUSINESS INFORMATICS RESEARCH, BIR 2019, 2019, 365 : 148 - 162
  • [6] Business Process Compliance Tracking Using Key Performance Indicators
    Shamsaei, Azalia
    Pourshahid, Alireza
    Amyot, Daniel
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS, 2011, 66 : 73 - 84
  • [7] Key performance indicators for small business
    Lace, Natalja
    Sundukova, Zoja
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT'2006/THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT: DIAGNOSIS, STRATEGY, EFFICIENCY, 2007, : 41 - +
  • [8] Key Performance Indicators Used to Measure SMEs Business Performance
    Ahmad, Abd Rahman
    San, Tan Li
    Soon, Ng Kim
    Yusoff, Rosman Md
    Sapry, Hairul Rizad Md
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, EDUCATION EXCELLENCE, AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I-VII, 2017, : 1249 - 1260
  • [9] Toward an Ontology-based model of key performance indicators for business process improvement
    Amor, Emna Ammar El Hadj
    Ghannouchi, Sonia Ayachi
    [J]. 2017 IEEE/ACS 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA), 2017, : 148 - 153
  • [10] A Formal Basis for Business Model Evaluation with Linguistic Summaries (Work-in-Progress Paper)
    Gilsing, Rick
    Wilbik, Anna
    Grefen, Paul
    Turetken, Oktay
    Ozkan, Baris
    [J]. ENTERPRISE, BUSINESS-PROCESS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODELING, BPMDS 2020, EMMSAD 2020, 2020, 387 : 428 - 442