A microbiological study of anterior nasal packs in epistaxis

被引:9
|
作者
Gupta A. [1 ]
Agrawal S.R. [1 ]
Sivarajan K. [1 ]
Gupta V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of E.N.T., Pravara Rural Medical College, Loni
关键词
ANP; Anterior nasal pack TSS; Toxic shock syndrome;
D O I
10.1007/BF02996844
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bleeding per nose is one of the commonest ailment encountered by each and every otolaryngologyst. Since hemostasis is immediate concern, anterior nasal pressure pack is put and is usually allowed to remain for 24-72 hours. Blood soaked pack and raw mucosal surface are good media for bacterial multiplication resulting in infection including sinusitis and sometimes toxic shock syndromes. Present study is conducted to work out bacterial flora of anterior nasal pack and effect of systemic antibiotics in controlling it. Thirty cases of epistaxis of different etiology were included. Out of these 26 cases were positive on culture. These included Staphylococcus aureus 70%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa twenty three percent. Klabsiella pneumonia and proteus mirabilis 3.3%, Streptococcus and Hemolyticus 3.3%. Details of type and duration of packing and its relation with organism cultured are discussed. It is concluded that the packing material should be soaked with antibiotics prior to use and should not be kept for more than 48 hours. And systemic antibiotics does not have any significant on this local infection due to packing.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 46
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NASAL PACKS FOR EPISTAXIS
    SAUNDERS, WH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1971, 218 (12): : 1830 - &
  • [2] Duration of Nasal Packs in the Management of Epistaxis
    Kundi, Nasir Akram
    Raza, Mohsin
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2015, 25 (03): : 202 - 205
  • [3] Nasal Packs for Epistaxis: Predictors of Success
    Hardman, John C.
    Ellis, Matthew
    Hall, Andy
    Mehta, Nishchay
    Smith, Matthew E.
    Williams, Richard J.
    Milinis, Kristijonas
    Tikka, Theofano
    Slovick, Anna
    Swords, Chloe
    Hutson, Kristian
    Kwong, Foon Ng Kee
    Carrie, Sean
    Hopkins, Claire
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 45 (05) : 659 - 666
  • [4] The use of Merocel nasal packs in the treatment of epistaxis
    Pringle, MB
    Beasley, P
    Brightwell, AP
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1996, 110 (06): : 543 - 546
  • [5] ALTERNATIVES TO ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR PACKS FOR EPISTAXIS
    JOSEPH, MP
    KELLY, JH
    FRIED, MP
    STROME, M
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1981, 67 (04) : 530 - 533
  • [6] Managing Epistaxis Patients With Nasal Packs: Is It Safe to Discharge Patients Home With Nasal Packs in Situ?
    Tathgar, A.
    LeBihan, G.
    Liu, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 86 - 86
  • [7] SLEEP-APNEA IN EPISTAXIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH NASAL PACKS
    WETMORE, SJ
    SCRIMA, L
    HILLER, FC
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1988, 98 (06) : 596 - 599
  • [8] SLEEP-APNEA IN EPISTAXIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH NASAL PACKS
    WETMORE, SJ
    HILLER, CF
    SCRIMA, L
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1987, 97 (02) : 160 - 160
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF NASAL BALLOONS AND POSTERIOR GAUZE PACKS FOR POSTERIOR EPISTAXIS
    COOK, PR
    RENNER, G
    WILLIAMS, F
    EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 1985, 64 (09): : 446 - 449
  • [10] Should prophylactic antibiotics be used routinely in epistaxis patients with nasal packs?
    Biggs, T. C.
    Nightingale, K.
    Patel, N. N.
    Salib, R. J.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2013, 95 (01) : 40 - 42