A two-layer algorithm based on PSO for solving unit commitment problem

被引:0
|
作者
Yu Zhai
Xiaofeng Liao
Nankun Mu
Junqing Le
机构
[1] Southwest University,Chongqing Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Circuits and Intelligent Information Processing, College of Electronic and Information Engineering
[2] Chongqing University,Key Laboratory of Dependable Service Computing in Cyber Physical Society
来源
Soft Computing | 2020年 / 24卷
关键词
Unit commitment problem; Economic load distribution; Particle swarm optimization; Simulated annealing algorithm;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is well known that electric generators consume huge amounts of energy every year. Nowadays, research for the unit commitment problem (UCP) has become a very important task in a power plant. However, the existing optimal methods for solving UCP are very easy to fall into local optimum, resulting in poor performance. Moreover, as no separate layering of economic load distribution, the existing algorithms are very inefficient. Toward this end, a new algorithm named improved simulated annealing particle swarm optimization (ISAPSO) is proposed in this paper. The proposed algorithm consists of a two-layer structure which is designed to simplify the complex problem of UCP. Specifically, in the upper layer, the algorithm based on elitist strategy PSO and SA is much easier to jump out of the local optimum when solving UCP and thus gets a better solution. In the lower layer, convex optimization approach is used to improve the search efficiency of ISAPSO. Furthermore, several methods are also designed to solve the problem-related constraints, which can save a lot of computing resources. Finally, the experimental results show that the cost performance of ISAPSO is better than that of the existing algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:9161 / 9178
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Solving the unit commitment problem by a unit decommitment method
    Tseng, CL
    Li, CA
    Oren, SS
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 105 (03) : 707 - 730
  • [32] Solution for Multi-area Unit Commitment Problem Using PSO-Based Modified Firefly Algorithm
    Prabakaran, Samikkannu
    Tamilselvi, Selvaraj
    Raj, Perianayagam Ajay-D-Vimal
    Sudhakaran, Mahalingam
    Rajasekar, Selvamuthukumaran
    ADVANCES IN SYSTEMS, CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, 2018, 442 : 625 - 636
  • [33] Hybridizing genetic algorithm with differential evolution for solving the unit commitment scheduling problem
    Trivedi, Anupam
    Srinivasan, Dipti
    Biswas, Subhodip
    Reindl, Thomas
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 23 : 50 - 64
  • [34] Solving the unit commitment problem with a genetic algorithm through a constraint satisfaction technique
    Yang, PC
    Yang, HT
    Huang, CL
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1996, 37 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [35] Tuned Fuzzy Adapted Firefly Lambda Algorithm for Solving Unit Commitment Problem
    Chandrasekaran, K.
    Simone, Sishaj P.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 8 (02) : 132 - 150
  • [36] Solving unit commitment problem using a novel version of harmony search algorithm
    Morsali R.
    Jafari T.
    Ghods A.
    Karimi M.
    Frontiers in Energy, 2014, 8 (3) : 297 - 304
  • [37] Solving unit commitment problem by combining of continuous relaxation method and genetic algorithm
    Tokoro, Ken-ichi
    Masuda, Yasushi
    Nishino, Hisakazu
    2008 PROCEEDINGS OF SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2008, : 3323 - +
  • [38] Implementation of coyote optimization algorithm for solving unit commitment problem in power systems
    Ali, E. S.
    Abd Elazim, S. M.
    Balobaid, A. S.
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [39] Improved PSO Approach for The Solution of Unit Commitment Problem
    Guo, Y. R.
    Wu, Y. H.
    Zhang, J. R.
    Ren, J. D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING (AIIE 2015), 2015, 123 : 510 - 513
  • [40] Tabu search algorithm for two-layer networks design problem
    Lenarski, Krzysztof
    Czajka, Bartosz
    Pozniak-Koszalka, Iwona
    Kasprzak, Andrzej
    ICSENG 2008: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, : 319 - 324