Combating Chronic Renal Allograft DysfunctionOptimal Immunosuppressive Regimens

被引:0
|
作者
Pierre Merville
机构
[1] Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pellegrin-Tripode,Department of Nephrology
[2] Université Bordeaux,Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 5164
来源
Drugs | 2005年 / 65卷
关键词
Acute Rejection; Sirolimus; Graft Survival; Brain Death; Delay Graft Function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, both in terms of survival benefit and quality of life. The major limitation is the continuing shortage of kidneys suitable for transplantation, reinforcing the need to maximise graft survival. After the first year of transplantation, chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD) is the first cause of late graft deterioration and failure. CRAD has been defined as a progressive renal dysfunction, independent of acute rejection, drug toxicity and recurrent or de novo nephropathy, with features on biopsy of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) characterised by vascular intimai hyperplasia, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and chronic transplant glomerulopathy. Protocol biopsy-based studies have demonstrated a high and early prevalence of CAN lesions during the first year in patients with normal and stable renal function. Beyond 1 year, the injuries associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) appear to be very common. The physiopathology of CRAD is complex and multifactorial. Both alloantigen-dependent factors (acute ejection, HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, inadequate immunosuppression) and alloantigen-independent factors (donor age, brain death, ischaemia/reperfusion injuries, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cytomegalovirus, CNI-related nephrotoxicity) are involved. Consequently, CRAD appears as a dynamic process, evolving with time, and immunosuppressive regimens need to be modulated in order to provide the most suitable treatment at the different phases of its natural history. On the basis of this scheme, the new paradigm would be the use of a CNI-based regimen during the period of maximal risk of (subclinical) acute rejection, followed by a conversion to a CNI-free regimen in order to avoid the long-term consequences of nephrotoxicity. Fortunately, new agents are being introduced in clinical practice providing a large range of combinations and allowing individualisation of immunosuppressive regimens. Large, prospective, multicentre trials are warranted, and the challenge is to define new endpoints of CRAD and to determine the best therapeutic strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 631
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CHRONIC REJECTION IN PRIMARY RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS UNDER CYCLOSPORINE-PREDNISONE IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY
    KNIGHT, RJ
    KERMAN, RH
    WELSH, M
    GOLDEN, D
    SCHOENBERG, L
    VANBUREN, CT
    LEWIS, RM
    KAHAN, BD
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 51 (02) : 355 - 359
  • [32] The effect of differing immunosuppressive regimes on the functional and morphologic changes in a rat renal allograft model of chronic rejection
    McGrath, JS
    Shehata, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (03) : 2191 - 2192
  • [33] Complete Tumor Response to Pembrolizumab and Allograft Preservation in Renal Allograft Recipient on Immunosuppressive Therapy
    Sadaat, Masood
    Jang, Sekwon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (03) : 198 - +
  • [34] Chronic renal vein thrombosis in a renal allograft
    Lim, WH
    Van Schie, G
    Warr, K
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 8 (05) : 248 - 250
  • [35] IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS AND CHRONIC RENAL DISEASE
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 1967, 1 (7499): : 1093 - +
  • [36] Effect of immunosuppressive drug regimens on acute and chronic murine toxoplasmosis
    Sumyuen, MH
    Garin, YJF
    Derouin, F
    [J]. PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 1996, 82 (08): : 681 - 686
  • [37] IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY OF CHRONIC RENAL DISEASE
    MICHAEL, AF
    VERNIER, RL
    DRUMMOND, KN
    LEVITT, JI
    HERDMAN, RC
    FISH, AJ
    GOOD, RA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1967, 276 (15): : 817 - &
  • [38] sCD30 and neopterin as risk factors of chronic renal transplant rejection - Impact of different immunosuppressive regimens
    Weimer, R
    Suesal, C
    Staak, A
    Yildiz, S
    Pelzl, S
    Renner, F
    Dietrich, H
    Daniel, V
    Feuring, E
    Kamali-Ernst, S
    Ernst, W
    Padberg, W
    Opelz, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 : 318 - 319
  • [39] sCD30 and neopterin as risk factors of chronic renal transplant rejection - Impact of different immunosuppressive regimens
    Weimer, R
    Suesal, C
    Staak, A
    Yildiz, S
    Pelzl, S
    Renner, F
    Dietrich, H
    Daniel, V
    Feuring, E
    Kamali-Ernst, S
    Ernst, W
    Padberg, W
    Opelz, G
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 : V160 - V161
  • [40] Recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy for prevention of renal allograft rejection
    Lunsford, Keri E.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Brennan, Todd V.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 16 (04) : 390 - 397