Combating Chronic Renal Allograft DysfunctionOptimal Immunosuppressive Regimens

被引:0
|
作者
Pierre Merville
机构
[1] Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pellegrin-Tripode,Department of Nephrology
[2] Université Bordeaux,Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 5164
来源
Drugs | 2005年 / 65卷
关键词
Acute Rejection; Sirolimus; Graft Survival; Brain Death; Delay Graft Function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, both in terms of survival benefit and quality of life. The major limitation is the continuing shortage of kidneys suitable for transplantation, reinforcing the need to maximise graft survival. After the first year of transplantation, chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD) is the first cause of late graft deterioration and failure. CRAD has been defined as a progressive renal dysfunction, independent of acute rejection, drug toxicity and recurrent or de novo nephropathy, with features on biopsy of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) characterised by vascular intimai hyperplasia, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis and chronic transplant glomerulopathy. Protocol biopsy-based studies have demonstrated a high and early prevalence of CAN lesions during the first year in patients with normal and stable renal function. Beyond 1 year, the injuries associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) appear to be very common. The physiopathology of CRAD is complex and multifactorial. Both alloantigen-dependent factors (acute ejection, HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, inadequate immunosuppression) and alloantigen-independent factors (donor age, brain death, ischaemia/reperfusion injuries, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cytomegalovirus, CNI-related nephrotoxicity) are involved. Consequently, CRAD appears as a dynamic process, evolving with time, and immunosuppressive regimens need to be modulated in order to provide the most suitable treatment at the different phases of its natural history. On the basis of this scheme, the new paradigm would be the use of a CNI-based regimen during the period of maximal risk of (subclinical) acute rejection, followed by a conversion to a CNI-free regimen in order to avoid the long-term consequences of nephrotoxicity. Fortunately, new agents are being introduced in clinical practice providing a large range of combinations and allowing individualisation of immunosuppressive regimens. Large, prospective, multicentre trials are warranted, and the challenge is to define new endpoints of CRAD and to determine the best therapeutic strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 631
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combating chronic renal allograft dysfunction - Optimal immunosuppressive regimens
    Merville, P
    [J]. DRUGS, 2005, 65 (05) : 615 - 631
  • [2] Randomized trial of three different immunosuppressive regimens to prevent chronic renal allograft rejection
    Burke, GW
    Ciancio, C
    Blomberg, BB
    Rosen, A
    Suzart, K
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1610 - 1611
  • [3] EVOLUTION OF RENAL FUNCTION IN RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS UNDER VARIOUS EVEROLIMUS BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMENS
    Skalioti, Chrysanthi
    Marinaki, Smaragdi
    Darema, Maria
    Lionaki, Sofia
    Antonakopoulos, Nikos
    Zavos, George
    Boletis, John
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 100 - 100
  • [4] CHRONIC REJECTION OF RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS WITH 4 IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMENS
    ISONIEMI, H
    AHONEN, J
    KROGERUS, L
    EKLUND, B
    HOCKERSTEDT, K
    SALMELA, K
    HAYRY, P
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1992, 24 (06) : 2716 - 2717
  • [5] Immunosuppressive regimens for renal transplantation
    Briggs, JD
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 16 : 153 - 155
  • [6] Evolution of Renal Function in Renal Allograft Recipients Under Various Everolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimens
    Skalioti, C.
    Marinaki, S.
    Darema, M.
    Lionaki, S.
    Antonakopoulos, N.
    Zavos, G.
    Boletis, J.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 47 (06) : 1705 - 1710
  • [7] FREQUENCY OF ALLOGRAFT RENAL VASCULAR THROMBOSIS UNDER 3 IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMENS AT A SINGLE INSTITUTION
    GRUBER, SA
    CHAVERS, B
    PAYNE, WD
    FRYD, DS
    CANAFAX, DM
    SIMMONS, RL
    NAJARIAN, JS
    MATAS, A
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1989, 21 (01) : 2139 - 2140
  • [8] Reduction in subclinical renal allograft rejection with new immunosuppressive regimens: Evidence from early protocol biopsies
    Roberts, IS
    Stratopoulos, C
    Zilvetti, M
    Reddy, S
    Russell, C
    Davies, DR
    Friend, PJ
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 : V3 - V4
  • [9] Calcineurin inhibitor sparing immunosuppressive regimens in kidney allograft recipients
    Baczkowska, Teresa
    Durlik, Magdalena
    [J]. POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 119 (05): : 318 - 325
  • [10] Randomized Trial of Immunosuppressive Regimens in Renal Transplantation
    Guerra, Giselle
    Ciancio, Gaetano
    Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
    Zarak, Alberto
    Brown, Randolph
    Hanson, Lois
    Sageshima, Junichiro
    Roth, David
    Chen, Linda
    Kupin, Warren
    Tueros, Lissett
    Ruiz, Phillip
    Livingstone, Alan S.
    Burke, George W., III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 22 (09): : 1758 - 1768