Return on environmentAn objective indicator to validate life cycle assessments?

被引:0
|
作者
David Hunkeler
Gautam Biswas
机构
[1] Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,Department of Chemistry
[2] Vanderbilt University,US
关键词
EMS; Environmental Management System (EMS); Impact Assessment; ISO; LCIA; life cycle costing; Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA); life cycle management; Return on Environment (ROE); risk assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Return on Environment (ROE) is developed, and tested, as an objective indicator to support the results of Life Cycle Assessments. It is based on the observation that a ratio of life cycle costs incurred throughout the extraction, transport, manufacturing, use and disposal stages, to the selling price, appears to scale linearly with a quantitative impact assessment. ROE is therefore a normalization method which permits comparison of new assessments with existing data, even from products with quite different characteristics. It can, alternatively, be applied to estimate either the life cycle cost, or quantify environmental impact, provided the other is known. Like its economic cousin, the return on investment, cases studied typically have ROEs in over the range of 2–20%. ROE is intended as a preliminary estimation method, akin to engineering costing, which has a precision of +-30%. As such, it can be used to rapidly determine if a more detailed cost assessment can be justified and, if so, where the efforts should be oriented. ROE is a measurable life cycle index intended to render LCAs more suitable for decision making. A further benefit that ROE provides is the guidance to a life cycle practitioner, or product development team, to assess if sufficient data has been collected, or if costs and impacts have been over or under-estimated. It has advantages over specific ecoindicators, such as manufacturing energy or waste emissions, which are both product specific and subjective. The Return on Environment also serves as a systematic index for reporting improvements or as a relative environmental rating.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 362
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chinese life cycle impact assessments factors
    Yang, JX
    Nielsen, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2001, 13 (02) : 205 - 209
  • [32] Assessing the availability of life cycle assessments in Austria
    A. O. Ladenika
    Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin
    Nicholas W. Burman
    Joel Croft
    Shaun Engelbrecht
    Taahira Goga
    O. S. MacGregor
    Mpho Maepa
    Kevin G. Harding
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 : 614 - 619
  • [33] Attributional and consequential life cycle assessments in a circular economy with integration of a quality indicator: A case study of cascading wood products
    Tanguay, Xavier
    Essoua Essoua, Gatien Geraud
    Amor, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 25 (06) : 1462 - 1473
  • [34] Life cycle services maximise return on assets
    Anon
    [J]. Australian Electronics Engineering, 2001, 34 (12):
  • [35] Environmental Sustainability Assessments of Pharmaceuticals: An Emerging Need for Simplification in Life Cycle Assessments
    De Soete, Wouter
    Debaveye, Sam
    De Meester, Steven
    Van der Vorst, Geert
    Aelterman, Wim
    Heirman, Bert
    Cappuyns, Philippe
    Dewulf, Jo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (20) : 12247 - 12255
  • [36] Sources of Variation in Life Cycle Assessments of Desktop Computers
    Teehan, Paul
    Kandlikar, Milind
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 : S182 - S194
  • [37] Allocation and system boundary in life cycle assessments of cities
    Alberti, Jaume
    Roca, Merce
    Brodhag, Christian
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 83 : 41 - 54
  • [38] Modeling process and material alternatives in life cycle assessments
    Cooper, Joyce
    Godwin, Christina
    Hall, Edie Sonne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (02): : 115 - 123
  • [39] A review on life cycle assessments of thermally modified wood
    Candelier, Kevin
    Dibdiakova, Janka
    [J]. HOLZFORSCHUNG, 2021, 75 (03) : 199 - 224
  • [40] The green circularity: Life cycle assessments for the space industry
    Jones, Karen L.
    Jain, Asha K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPACE SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2023, 10 (03): : 340 - 350