Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study

被引:0
|
作者
Timo Järvelä
机构
[1] Hatanpää Hospital,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
[2] Sports Clinic and Hospital Mehiläinen,undefined
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Double bundle technique; Prospective randomize study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Anatomical observation and biomechanical studies have shown that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) mainly consists of two distinct bundles, the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle. Conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques have focused on the restoration of the AM bundle while giving limited attention to the PL bundle. The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical study is to compare the outcomes of ACL reconstruction when using either double-bundle or single-bundle technique and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation, and similar rehabilitation with both techniques. Sixty-five patients were randomized into either double-bundle (n = 35) or single-bundle (n = 30) ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons and bioabsorbable screw (Hexalon, Inion Company, Tampere, Finland) fixation in both groups. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, radiographic evaluation, as well as International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm knee scores. There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. For an average of 14 months of follow-up (range 12–20 months), 30 patients of the double-bundle group and 29 patients of the single-bundle group were available (91%). At the follow-up, the rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot shift test, was significantly better in the double-bundle group than in the single-bundle group. However, in anterior stability of the knee, there was no significant difference between the groups. None of the patients in the double-bundle group had graft failure, while four patients in the single-bundle group had. In addition, knee scores were equal at the follow-up, and all the results were significantly better at the follow-up than preoperatively, in both groups.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis
    Li, Xue
    Xu, Chang-peng
    Song, Jin-qi
    Jiang, Nan
    Yu, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) : 213 - 226
  • [42] Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis
    Xue Li
    Chang-peng Xu
    Jin-qi Song
    Nan Jiang
    Bin Yu
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 213 - 226
  • [43] Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionA comparative study with propensity score matching
    Jeong-Ku Ha
    Dhong-Won Lee
    Jin-Goo Kim
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 : 505 - 511
  • [44] Comparison of Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized Study
    Li, Yongqian
    Li, Jia
    Wang, Jianzhao
    Gao, Shijun
    Zhang, Yingze
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (06): : 695 - 700
  • [45] A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system
    Araki, Daisuke
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    Kubo, Seiji
    Fujita, Norifumi
    Tei, Katsumasa
    Nishimoto, Koji
    Hoshino, Yuichi
    Matsushita, Takehiko
    Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
    Nagamune, Koki
    Kurosaka, Masahiro
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (03) : 439 - 446
  • [46] A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system
    Daisuke Araki
    Ryosuke Kuroda
    Seiji Kubo
    Norifumi Fujita
    Katsumasa Tei
    Koji Nishimoto
    Yuichi Hoshino
    Takehiko Matsushita
    Tomoyuki Matsumoto
    Koki Nagamune
    Masahiro Kurosaka
    International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35 : 439 - 446
  • [47] Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructiond-5-Year Results
    Mayr, Hermann O.
    Bruder, Silvia
    Hube, Robert
    Bernstein, Anke
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Stoehr, Amelie
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (09): : 2647 - 2653
  • [48] Mechanical behavior of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament repair with a single tibial tunnel
    Maestro Fernandez, A.
    Fernandez Lombardia, J.
    Paz Aparicio, A.
    Rodriguez Lopez, L.
    Garcia Gonzalez, P.
    Fernandez Lombardia, M., I
    Guerrero Rosales, M. A.
    Jorge Rellan, J.
    Vigil Castiello, F. J.
    TRAUMA-SPAIN, 2010, 21 (02): : 97 - 101
  • [49] A Retrospective Comparison of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Ahn, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Jaehyun
    Mun, Ji Weon
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 37 (03): : 976 - 984
  • [50] Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative 2-Year Follow-up
    Mayr, Hermann O.
    Benecke, Paul
    Hoell, Anna
    Schmitt-Sody, Marcus
    Bernstein, Anke
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Stoehr, Amelie
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (01): : 34 - 42